Suppr超能文献

边缘型人格障碍诊断访谈的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the diagnostic interview for borderlines.

作者信息

Cornell D G, Silk K R, Ludolph P S, Lohr N E

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Dec;40(12):1307-10. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790110049009.

Abstract

Gunderson's Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) has gained increasing acceptance and use as a diagnostic research instrument. Although previous studies report interrater reliability for the DIB, no attention has been given to problems of test-retest reliability or variability among different clinicians conducting a semistructured clinical interview. This study demonstrated both interrater and test-retest reliability for the DIB when it is administered by trained clinicians. No effects of interviewer sex were found, but less experienced clinicians tended to give higher (more borderline) scores than more experienced clinicians.

摘要

冈德森边缘性人格障碍诊断访谈量表(DIB)作为一种诊断研究工具,越来越被广泛接受和使用。尽管先前的研究报告了DIB的评分者间信度,但对于重测信度问题或不同临床医生进行半结构化临床访谈时的变异性问题,却未予以关注。本研究表明,当由经过培训的临床医生实施DIB时,其具有评分者间信度和重测信度。未发现访谈者性别产生影响,但经验不足的临床医生往往比经验丰富的临床医生给出更高(更倾向于边缘性人格障碍)的评分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验