Suppr超能文献

结构化访谈与边缘型人格障碍

Structured interviews and borderline personality disorder.

作者信息

Loranger A W, Oldham J M, Russakoff L M, Susman V

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Jun;41(6):565-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790170039005.

Abstract

A study was designed to determine whether the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB) might be scored from the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS), and also whether DIB scores predicted the clinical diagnosis of DSM-III borderline personality disorder. One pair of clinicians interviewed patients with the DIB, and another pair interviewed the same patients with a slightly modified version of the SADS. Both interviews diagnosed virtually the same patients as borderline according to the criteria of Gunderson and Singer. The sensitivity of DIB scores in predicting a DSM-III diagnosis of borderline was 70%, while the specificity was 90%; the intraclass correlation coefficient was .75. Although there is a substantial concordance, the disparity between the DSM-III and DIB systems of diagnosing borderline patients is sufficiently great to preclude the generalization of findings from studies employing one set of criteria to those employing the other.

摘要

一项研究旨在确定是否可以根据情感障碍与精神分裂症日程表(SADS)对边缘型人格障碍诊断访谈(DIB)进行评分,以及DIB分数是否能预测DSM-III边缘型人格障碍的临床诊断。一组临床医生用DIB对患者进行访谈,另一组临床医生用稍作修改的SADS版本对相同患者进行访谈。根据冈德森和辛格的标准,两次访谈几乎将相同的患者诊断为边缘型。DIB分数预测DSM-III边缘型诊断的敏感性为70%,特异性为90%;组内相关系数为0.75。尽管存在相当大的一致性,但DSM-III和DIB诊断边缘型患者的系统之间的差异足够大,以至于无法将采用一套标准的研究结果推广到采用另一套标准的研究中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验