Suppr超能文献

使用耳镜和不使用耳镜进行听力阈值测量的比较。

Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum.

作者信息

Ivarsson A, Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Nilsson P, Bennrup S, Sheppard H

出版信息

Audiology. 1983 Sep-Oct;22(5):421-9. doi: 10.3109/00206098309072803.

Abstract

The hearing threshold levels of a small group of shipyard workers having differing degrees of hearing impairment were measured five times using the following audiometric techniques: fixed-tone Békésy audiometry with MX 41/AR cushions, fixed-tone Békésy audiometry with an ear speculum, and sweep-frequency Békésy audiometry with an ear speculum. From these data the mean standard deviations of the hearing threshold levels for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 kHz were calculated, thus giving a measure of the accuracy of each method. The hearing threshold levels obtained by the three methods are compared, and the merits of data handling, expressing hearing threshold levels in pascals rather than decibels, are also discussed.

摘要

使用以下听力测定技术,对一小群有不同程度听力损伤的造船厂工人的听力阈值水平进行了五次测量:使用MX 41/AR缓冲垫的固定音贝凯西听力测定法、使用耳镜的固定音贝凯西听力测定法以及使用耳镜的扫频贝凯西听力测定法。根据这些数据,计算出了0.5、1、2、3、4、5、6、7和8千赫兹频率下听力阈值水平的平均标准差,从而得出了每种方法准确性的度量。比较了通过这三种方法获得的听力阈值水平,并讨论了以帕斯卡而非分贝表示听力阈值水平的数据处理优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验