Suppr超能文献

情感性言语表达的分组修正:强化与治疗师风格的影响

Group modification of affective verbalizations: reinforcement and therapist style effects.

作者信息

Fromme D K, Dickey G V, Schaefer J P

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;39(6):893-900. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<893::aid-jclp2270390612>3.0.co;2-m.

Abstract

Used an operant group paradigm to investigate the effects of reinforcement in combination with differing therapist styles upon affective verbalizations. Therapists' usage of direct questioning to elicit Ss' affective verbalizations proved quantitatively superior (in number of reinforceable responses) to either a no therapist or role modelling therapist condition (N = 72). There was evidence, however, that Ss in reinforced role modelling conditions were significantly better than direct elicitation Ss in predicting other group members' self-descriptions and in the degree to which Ss felt accurately perceived by others, while the reverse was true for non-reinforced Ss.

摘要

使用操作性团体范式来研究强化与不同治疗师风格相结合对情感言语表达的影响。事实证明,治疗师使用直接提问来引出被试的情感言语表达在数量上(可强化反应的数量)优于无治疗师或榜样治疗师条件(N = 72)。然而,有证据表明,在强化榜样条件下的被试在预测其他团体成员的自我描述以及被试感觉被他人准确感知的程度方面明显优于直接引出情感言语表达的被试,而在非强化条件下的被试情况则相反。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验