Turner R M, Newman F L, Foa E
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;39(6):933-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<933::aid-jclp2270390619>3.0.co;2-4.
Demonstrated a set of research techniques that combine multidimensional scaling, a quantitative cognitive procedure, and cost outcome analysis. The multidimensional scaling results supported Reed's (1969) notion that obsessive-compulsive clients are underinclusive and did not support Foa and Steketee's (1979) contention that they are overinclusive. Significant differences in extent of follow-up therapy were found between obsessive compulsives (N = 12) with the underinclusive cognitive style and those with a normal cognitive style.
展示了一组研究技术，这些技术将多维尺度分析（一种定量认知程序）和成本效益分析结合在一起。多维尺度分析的结果支持里德（1969年）的观点，即强迫性障碍患者的认知范围过窄，并不支持福阿和斯特克蒂（1979年）关于他们认知范围过宽的论点。在认知范围过窄的强迫性障碍患者（N = 12）和具有正常认知风格的患者之间，发现后续治疗程度存在显著差异。
