Kastenbaum R
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1983;17(1):71-4. doi: 10.2190/LTH5-NWVJ-0W86-HW07.
It is perhaps time for the 4% fallacy to rest in peace. Those who are alert to logical and methodological issues have probably registered the message clearly enough in the years since the first article appeared [1] and those who prefer fallacy have by now well demonstrated their invincibility. The diligent labors of McConnel [2, this issue], however, invite a brief and final response.