• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison between subjective and ultrasound assessments of fetal movement.胎儿运动主观评估与超声评估的比较。
Br Med J. 1978 Jul 8;2(6130):88-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6130.88.
2
Maternal perception of fetal motor activity.母亲对胎儿胎动的感知。
Br Med J. 1979 Nov 10;2(6199):1183-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6199.1183.
3
Early fetal movement: a real-time ultrasound study.
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):194-8.
4
A comparison between maternal, tocodynamometric, and real-time ultrasonographic assessments of fetal movement.母体、宫缩压力图及实时超声对胎儿运动评估的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jun 15;140(4):456-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90045-4.
5
Ultrasonic assessment of fetal activity.胎儿活动的超声评估。
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Dec;10(3):541-63.
6
Influence of Doppler ultrasound on fetal activity.多普勒超声对胎儿活动的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Mar 26;286(6370):1009-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6370.1009.
7
The relation between fetal heart rate accelerations and fetal movements.胎儿心率加速与胎动之间的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jan;61(1):16-8.
8
[Experiencing fetal movements. A psychologic investigation of 386 pregnant and recently delivered women (author's transl)].
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1975 Oct;179(5):377-82.
9
Fetal movement detection: comparison of the Toitu actograph with ultrasound from 20 weeks gestation.胎动检测:托伊图活动记录仪与妊娠20周起超声检查的比较
J Matern Fetal Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):237-42. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199911/12)8:6<237::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO;2-F.
10
The assessment of fetal behavior in early pregnancy: comparison between 2D and 4D sonographic scanning.孕早期胎儿行为评估:二维与四维超声扫描的比较
J Perinat Med. 2005;33(5):406-14. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2005.073.

引用本文的文献

1
Fetal Movement Counting Using Optical Fibre Sensors.使用光纤传感器进行胎动计数
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;21(1):48. doi: 10.3390/s21010048.
2
The effects of maternal exercise on developing rat fetuses.母体运动对发育中的大鼠胎儿的影响。
Br J Sports Med. 1983 Jun;17(2):117-21. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.17.2.117.
3
[Counting active movements of the fetus: could it be useful?].[计算胎儿的主动胎动:这会有用吗?]
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Dec 15;127(12):1172-5, 1194.

本文引用的文献

1
Palpable regular jerking movements of the human fetus: a possible respiratory sign of fetal distress.可触及的人类胎儿规律性抽搐运动:胎儿窘迫的一种可能的呼吸征象。
Biol Neonate. 1973;23(3):223-30. doi: 10.1159/000240604.
2
Correlation between electromagnetic recording and maternal assessment of fetal movement.电磁记录与母亲对胎动评估之间的相关性。
Lancet. 1973 May 26;1(7813):1141-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91144-6.
3
Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation.胎儿活动与胎儿健康:一项评估。
Br Med J. 1976 May 29;1(6021):1305-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6021.1305.
4
Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation.超声测量胎儿头腹围比在评估生长迟缓中的应用
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Mar;84(3):165-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x.
5
Methods of recording fetal movement.记录胎动的方法。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1977 Aug;84(8):561-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12653.x.

胎儿运动主观评估与超声评估的比较。

Comparison between subjective and ultrasound assessments of fetal movement.

作者信息

Gettinger A, Roberts A B, Campbell S

出版信息

Br Med J. 1978 Jul 8;2(6130):88-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6130.88.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.2.6130.88
PMID:667573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1605873/
Abstract

Forty pregnant women participated in a study to compare subjective with ultrasound assessments of fetal movements. A real-time ultrasound scanner was used. Movements were recorded for 45 minutes in all cases. There was a significant positive correlation between the number of movements recorded by the two methods, but the 95% confidence limits were wide and no correlation was found in those patients who recorded fewer than 20 movements in the study period. Thus "false-positive" information may be obtained from purely subjective data, and in patients reporting low "kick counts" fetal activity should be assessed from real-time ultrasound recordings.

摘要

40名孕妇参与了一项研究,以比较胎儿运动的主观评估与超声评估。使用了实时超声扫描仪。所有病例均记录45分钟的胎动情况。两种方法记录的胎动次数之间存在显著正相关,但95%置信区间较宽,且在研究期间胎动少于20次的患者中未发现相关性。因此,可能会从纯主观数据中获得“假阳性”信息,对于报告“踢腿计数”较低的患者,应通过实时超声记录来评估胎儿活动情况。