Huisjes H J, Lok-Meijer T Y, Touwen B C, Olinga A A
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1983;15(5):318-22. doi: 10.1159/000299426.
Neonatal neurological findings and the results of a neurological follow-up examination at 4 years of age were compared in two groups of subjects. The first group contained 39 children with an extremely low obstetrical optimality score, the second one contained 38 children with an extremely high obstetrical optimality score. More children were neurologically deviant in the first group than in the second one, both shortly after birth and at 4 years. The predictive power of the neonatal neurological examination was less in the low-optimality group, probably due to false-negative diagnoses in preterm infants.
对两组受试者的新生儿神经学检查结果以及4岁时的神经学随访检查结果进行了比较。第一组包含39名产科最优性评分极低的儿童,第二组包含38名产科最优性评分极高的儿童。无论是在出生后不久还是4岁时,第一组中神经学异常的儿童都比第二组多。在低最优性组中,新生儿神经学检查的预测能力较低,这可能是由于早产儿的假阴性诊断所致。