Gibbons R P, Correa R J, Brannen G E, Mason J T
J Urol. 1984 Jan;131(1):73-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50210-4.
Several treatment options currently are available for the patient with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate and each has its proponents. Comparison of results between institutions becomes necessary to determine the relative value of these treatments, keeping in mind the absence of a suitable control group in any series. Such inter-institutional treatment comparisons are possible only if the patient compositions are similar in terms of age, grade and extent of disease. Comparisons of patients with stage B disease frequently are made because most urologists agree that these patients have palpable disease confined to the prostate and no evidence of metastasis. At our clinic willing patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have an expected 15-year survival are treated preferentially with total prostatectomy. We summarize our experience with total prostatectomy in 215 consecutive patients, including 213 who were available for followup. There were 16 patients with clinical stage A, 195 with clinical stage B and 2 with clinical stage C disease. Of these patients 207 underwent radical perineal prostatectomy and there were no operative deaths. Patients did not receive adjuvant hormonal therapy unless disease recurred. Of the 110 patients who have undergone the operation within the last 5 years 98 per cent are alive. Actual survival and survival free of disease, respectively, for the entire series were 55 and 48 per cent at 15 years, 75 and 67 per cent at 10 years, and 94 and 86 per cent at 5 years, compared to 55 and 48, 74 and 67, and 95 and 90 per cent, respectively, for the 195 patients with clinical stage B disease. We believe these results demonstrate that in terms of local control of the disease, over-all survival and survival free of disease total prostatectomy remains the optimal treatment for patients with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate.
目前,对于临床局限性前列腺癌患者有多种治疗选择,每种都有其支持者。由于任何系列研究中都缺乏合适的对照组,因此有必要对不同机构的治疗结果进行比较,以确定这些治疗方法的相对价值。只有当患者在年龄、疾病分级和范围方面组成相似时,机构间的治疗比较才有可能。经常对B期疾病患者进行比较,因为大多数泌尿科医生认为这些患者可触及的病变局限于前列腺,且无转移证据。在我们诊所,预期存活15年的临床局限性前列腺腺癌患者若愿意,优先接受前列腺全切术治疗。我们总结了连续215例患者接受前列腺全切术的经验,其中213例可供随访。有16例临床A期患者,195例临床B期患者和2例临床C期患者。这些患者中,207例行根治性会阴前列腺切除术,无手术死亡。除非疾病复发,患者不接受辅助激素治疗。在过去5年内接受手术的110例患者中,98%存活。整个系列的实际生存率和无病生存率在15年时分别为55%和48%,10年时为75%和67%,5年时为94%和86%,相比之下,195例临床B期疾病患者的相应比例分别为55%和48%、74%和67%、95%和90%。我们认为这些结果表明,就疾病的局部控制、总体生存率和无病生存率而言,前列腺全切术仍是临床局限性前列腺癌患者的最佳治疗方法。