Suppr超能文献

继续医学教育效果的批判性评估。

A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education.

作者信息

Haynes R B, Davis D A, McKibbon A, Tugwell P

出版信息

JAMA. 1984 Jan 6;251(1):61-4.

PMID:6690767
Abstract

To determine the efficacy of continuing medical education (CME), we collected 248 original articles describing studies of CME interventions. These articles were reviewed for applicability and scientific credibility by applying preset methodological criteria. Thirteen percent of articles described randomized trials, but only 7% of all articles and 20% of randomized trials assessed the impact of CME on patient outcomes. Seven articles met all our criteria and were reviewed in detail. These studies provide convincing evidence that CME can improve physician behaviors. However, only three of these methodologically sound studies assessed patient outcomes and only one demonstrated any improvement in outcomes.

摘要

为了确定继续医学教育(CME)的效果,我们收集了248篇描述CME干预研究的原创文章。通过应用预设的方法学标准,对这些文章的适用性和科学可信度进行了审查。13%的文章描述了随机试验,但在所有文章中,只有7%以及在随机试验中只有20%评估了CME对患者结局的影响。有7篇文章符合我们所有的标准,并进行了详细审查。这些研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明CME可以改善医生的行为。然而,在这些方法学合理的研究中,只有3项评估了患者结局,且只有1项表明结局有任何改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验