Haynes R B, Davis D A, McKibbon A, Tugwell P
JAMA. 1984 Jan 6;251(1):61-4.
To determine the efficacy of continuing medical education (CME), we collected 248 original articles describing studies of CME interventions. These articles were reviewed for applicability and scientific credibility by applying preset methodological criteria. Thirteen percent of articles described randomized trials, but only 7% of all articles and 20% of randomized trials assessed the impact of CME on patient outcomes. Seven articles met all our criteria and were reviewed in detail. These studies provide convincing evidence that CME can improve physician behaviors. However, only three of these methodologically sound studies assessed patient outcomes and only one demonstrated any improvement in outcomes.
为了确定继续医学教育(CME)的效果,我们收集了248篇描述CME干预研究的原创文章。通过应用预设的方法学标准,对这些文章的适用性和科学可信度进行了审查。13%的文章描述了随机试验,但在所有文章中,只有7%以及在随机试验中只有20%评估了CME对患者结局的影响。有7篇文章符合我们所有的标准,并进行了详细审查。这些研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明CME可以改善医生的行为。然而,在这些方法学合理的研究中,只有3项评估了患者结局,且只有1项表明结局有任何改善。