Nathan D M, Singer D E, Hurxthal K, Goodson J D
N Engl J Med. 1984 Feb 9;310(6):341-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198402093100602.
We evaluated the clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay by comparing it with practitioners' estimates of glucose control over the preceding 10 weeks in 216 patients with diabetes. Twenty-four per cent of the practitioners' estimates, which were based on historical and laboratory data collected during a routine office visit, differed by more than +/- 75 mg per deciliter from the actual mean blood glucose levels calculated with the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. One third of the mean blood glucose concentration fell outside the confidence intervals physicians used to bound their estimates. When examined individually or in the aggregate, historical information, such as polyuria, nocturia, or home urine testing for glucose, and laboratory information, such as fasting or random blood glucose levels, were weak predictors of the actual mean concentration of blood glucose. We conclude that the glycosylated hemoglobin assay provides information about the degree of long-term glucose control that is not otherwise obtainable in the usual clinical setting.
我们通过将糖化血红蛋白检测结果与216例糖尿病患者的医生对其前10周血糖控制情况的评估进行比较,来评估糖化血红蛋白检测的临床信息价值。医生的评估基于常规门诊期间收集的病史和实验室数据,其中24%的评估结果与通过糖化血红蛋白检测计算出的实际平均血糖水平相差超过每分升±75毫克。三分之一的平均血糖浓度落在医生用于界定其评估范围的置信区间之外。单独或综合来看,诸如多尿、夜尿或家庭血糖检测等病史信息,以及诸如空腹或随机血糖水平等实验室信息,对实际平均血糖浓度的预测能力较弱。我们得出结论,糖化血红蛋白检测提供了有关长期血糖控制程度的信息,而这在通常的临床环境中无法通过其他方式获得。