• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性颅内肿瘤成像:磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描的比较

Primary intracranial tumor imaging: a comparison of magnetic resonance and CT.

作者信息

Brant-Zawadzki M, Badami J P, Mills C M, Norman D, Newton T H

出版信息

Radiology. 1984 Feb;150(2):435-40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691098.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691098
PMID:6691098
Abstract

Twenty-six patients with primary intracranial tumors were evaluated by magnetic resonance (MR) and a comparison was made with CT findings. The SE technique with TR = 2,000 ms and TE = 56 ms was most useful in delineating normal anatomy, in differentiating gray and white matter, and in optimizing the visualization of edema. The use of TR = 500 ms optimized sensitivity to T1 relaxation time differences in disparate tissue and best defined the cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Although prolongation of T1 and T2 relaxation values was seen with most malignant lesions, several cases produced no obvious prolongation of T1. Separation of tumor from surrounding edema was possible in several instances. In 16/26 patients information not available on CT was obtained with MR. This included detection of altered tissue characteristics where CT showed only mass effect, more accurate depiction of full extent and location of tumor, and visualization of associated abnormalities. However, a small inner ear epidermoid tumor seen with high-resolution CT (1.5-mm sections) was difficult to identify with certainty on MR, and in two other cases punctate foci of calcification were not identified on MR.

摘要

对26例原发性颅内肿瘤患者进行了磁共振(MR)评估,并与CT检查结果进行了比较。采用TR = 2000 ms、TE = 56 ms的自旋回波(SE)技术,在描绘正常解剖结构、区分灰质和白质以及优化水肿的可视化方面最为有用。使用TR = 500 ms可优化对不同组织中T1弛豫时间差异的敏感性,并能最佳地显示脑脊液间隙。虽然大多数恶性病变可见T1和T2弛豫值延长,但有几例T1未见明显延长。在一些情况下能够将肿瘤与周围水肿区分开来。在26例患者中有16例通过MR获得了CT未提供的信息。这包括在CT仅显示占位效应时检测到组织特征的改变、更准确地描绘肿瘤的完整范围和位置以及显示相关异常情况。然而,高分辨率CT(1.5毫米层厚)显示的一个小的内耳表皮样囊肿在MR上难以确切识别,另外两例中的点状钙化灶在MR上未被发现。

相似文献

1
Primary intracranial tumor imaging: a comparison of magnetic resonance and CT.原发性颅内肿瘤成像:磁共振成像与计算机断层扫描的比较
Radiology. 1984 Feb;150(2):435-40. doi: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691098.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging of primary intracranial tumors: a review.原发性颅内肿瘤的磁共振成像:综述
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Feb;11(2):315-21. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90153-1.
3
Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases.脑部临床核磁共振成像:140例病例。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Aug;139(2):215-36. doi: 10.2214/ajr.139.2.215.
4
Brain radiation lesions: MR imaging.脑放射性损伤:磁共振成像
Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):149-55. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940373.
5
Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique.脑部磁共振成像:最佳筛查技术。
Radiology. 1984 Jul;152(1):71-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729138.
6
[Magnetic resonance in the study of cerebral gliomas].[脑胶质瘤研究中的磁共振成像]
Radiol Med. 1986 Jun;72(6):431-8.
7
Central nervous system tumors in children: detection by magnetic resonance imaging.儿童中枢神经系统肿瘤:磁共振成像检测
Radiology. 1985 Apr;155(1):131-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.155.1.3975390.
8
Primary malignant rhabdoid tumor of the brain: CT and MR findings.原发性脑恶性横纹肌样瘤:CT与MR表现
Yonsei Med J. 2000 Feb;41(1):8-16. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2000.41.1.8.
9
Magnetic resonance with marked T2-weighted images: improved demonstration of brain lesions, tumor, and edema.带有显著T2加权图像的磁共振成像:对脑损伤、肿瘤和水肿的显示得到改善。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Nov;145(5):949-55. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.5.949.
10
Suprasellar lesions: evaluation with MR imaging.鞍上病变:磁共振成像评估
Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):77-82. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.1.3763887.

引用本文的文献

1
RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF MRI PATTERN OF GLIOBLASTOMA IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA.尼日利亚一家三级医院胶质母细胞瘤MRI模式的回顾性评估
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2023 Aug;21(2):17-23. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
Is it necessary for patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer to receive routine preoperative brain MRI/CT?对于潜在可切除的食管鳞癌患者,是否有必要常规进行术前脑部 MRI/CT 检查?
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Dec;13(23):3304-3309. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14686. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
A Mistaken Diagnosis of Secondary Glioblastoma as Parasitosis.
继发性胶质母细胞瘤误诊为寄生虫病。
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 6;10:952. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00952. eCollection 2019.
4
Review of the potential of optical technologies for cancer diagnosis in neurosurgery: a step toward intraoperative neurophotonics.神经外科中光学技术用于癌症诊断的潜力综述:迈向术中神经光子学的一步。
Neurophotonics. 2017 Jan;4(1):011010. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.1.011010. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像。
Can Fam Physician. 1986 May;32:1087-90.
6
Combination of high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient: added value to brain tumour imaging and clinical feasibility of non-contrast MRI at 3 T.高分辨率磁敏感加权成像与表观扩散系数的联合应用:对脑肿瘤成像的增值作用及 3T 场强下非对比 MRI 的临床可行性。
Br J Radiol. 2010 Jun;83(990):466-75. doi: 10.1259/bjr/34304111. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
7
Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diffusion and perfusion imaging.胶质瘤分级:扩散与灌注成像的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值
J Neurooncol. 2009 Aug;94(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9807-6. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
8
Correlation of MR perfusion imaging and vessel tortuosity parameters in assessment of intracranial neoplasms.磁共振灌注成像与血管迂曲度参数在颅内肿瘤评估中的相关性
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Dec;3(6):585-90. doi: 10.1177/153303460400300608.
9
Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging.胶质瘤分级:与传统磁共振成像相比,灌注磁共振成像和质子磁共振波谱成像的敏感性、特异性及预测价值
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Nov-Dec;24(10):1989-98.
10
Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery.正常压力脑积水:磁共振成像上的血管性白质改变不应排除患者接受分流手术。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Oct;22(9):1665-73.