• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Chemosensitivity testing of human solid tumors. A review of 1582 assays with 258 clinical correlations.

作者信息

Bertelsen C A, Sondak V K, Mann B D, Korn E L, Kern D H

出版信息

Cancer. 1984 Mar 15;53(6):1240-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840315)53:6<1240::aid-cncr2820530604>3.0.co;2-y.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19840315)53:6<1240::aid-cncr2820530604>3.0.co;2-y
PMID:6692313
Abstract

To improve clinical interpretation and use of in vitro clonogenic assay results, the authors reviewed their experience to date with chemosensitivity testing of over 1500 solid tumors. All clonogenic assays were performed using a double-layer-soft-agar system with continuous exposure of cells to one concentration of standard anticancer drugs. Significant growth was defined as greater than or equal to 30 colonies/control plate. Clinical responses were determined according to standard criteria. Data were analyzed using two different criteria of in vitro sensitivity (greater than or equal to 50% and greater than or equal to 75% inhibition of colony formation) and independently for each histologic type of tumor. Overall, 68% of specimens plated produced significant growth in vitro. Cloning ability varied from 57% to 82% depending on tumor histology. The assay was 57% reliable for predicting in vivo sensitivity, and 92% reliable for in vivo resistance. Predictive accuracy for sensitivity varied from 30% to 86%, depending on the tumor histology. Use of greater than or equal to 50% ICF (inhibition of colony formation) as criteria for differentiating sensitivity from resistance proved most reliable, although criteria should be individualized for each tumor type to maximize predictive accuracy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Chemosensitivity testing of human solid tumors. A review of 1582 assays with 258 clinical correlations.
Cancer. 1984 Mar 15;53(6):1240-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840315)53:6<1240::aid-cncr2820530604>3.0.co;2-y.
2
[Current status of the human tumor clonogenic assay for gastrointestinal cancer].[胃肠道癌人类肿瘤克隆形成试验的现状]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1985 Aug;12(8):1588-92.
3
[Results of in vitro chemosensitivity assays: human tumor clonogenic and scintillation assay].[体外化学敏感性测定结果:人肿瘤克隆形成及闪烁测定]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Apr;13(4 Pt 2):1176-84.
4
[Human tumor clonogenic assay in human breast cancer].[人乳腺癌的人肿瘤克隆形成试验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1985 Aug;12(8):1566-72.
5
Cooperative evaluation of human tumor chemosensitivity in the soft-agar assay and its clinical correlations.软琼脂试验中人类肿瘤化学敏感性的协同评估及其临床相关性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1985;109(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01884250.
6
Human tumor colony assay and chemosensitivity testing.人类肿瘤集落测定和化学敏感性测试。
Cancer Treat Rep. 1984 Jan;68(1):117-25.
7
Soft agar clonogenic assay for predicting chemosensitivity of human tumor cells from malignant effusions.
Biomedicine. 1981 Nov;35(6):177-8.
8
[In vitro chemosensitivity assay using a double-layer-agar system: human tumor cloning assay and thymidine incorporation assay].[使用双层琼脂系统的体外化学敏感性测定:人肿瘤克隆测定和胸苷掺入测定]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1993 Mar;20(4):440-6.
9
Pharmacologic assessment of regimen chemosensitivity in the soft-agar assay: effect of oxygen on human tumors.软琼脂试验中化疗方案化学敏感性的药理学评估:氧气对人类肿瘤的影响
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1985;110(3):209-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00399275.
10
Human tumor cloning: feasibility and clinical correlations.人类肿瘤克隆:可行性及临床关联
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1981;6(3):265-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00256979.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Derived Ex Vivo Cultures and Endpoint Assays with Surrogate Biomarkers in Functional Testing for Prediction of Therapeutic Response.用于预测治疗反应的功能测试中基于患者的体外培养和具有替代生物标志物的终点测定
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;15(16):4104. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164104.
2
Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.功能检测在个体化癌症医学中的优势:不只是概念验证。
Theranostics. 2021 Sep 21;11(19):9538-9556. doi: 10.7150/thno.55954. eCollection 2021.
3
Personalized in vitro cancer models to predict therapeutic response: Challenges and a framework for improvement.
预测治疗反应的个性化体外癌症模型:挑战与改进框架
Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;165:79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 21.
4
Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine.癌症耐药性的预测及其对个性化医疗的意义。
Front Oncol. 2015 Dec 17;5:282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00282. eCollection 2015.
5
Prospective cohort study using the breast cancer spheroid model as a predictor for response to neoadjuvant therapy--the SpheroNEO study.使用乳腺癌球体模型作为新辅助治疗反应预测指标的前瞻性队列研究——SpheroNEO研究。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jul 15;15:519. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1491-7.
6
ABCC3 as a marker for multidrug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.ABCC3作为非小细胞肺癌多药耐药的标志物。
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 1;3:3120. doi: 10.1038/srep03120.
7
The Cancer BioChip System: a functional genomic assay for anchorage-independent three-dimensional breast cancer cell growth.癌症生物芯片系统:一种用于无锚定三维乳腺癌细胞生长的功能基因组分析方法。
Horm Cancer. 2012 Dec;3(5-6):261-70. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0116-8. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Effect of cell isolation methods and drug concentration on the use of the Differential Staining Cytotoxicity (DiSC) assay with solid tumours.细胞分离方法和药物浓度对固体肿瘤差异染色细胞毒性(DiSC)检测的影响。
Cytotechnology. 1989 Aug;2(3):225-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00133247.
9
Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST).原发与配对转移性肺癌组织间化疗敏感性的差异:基于胶原凝胶微滴包裹培养药敏试验(CD-DST)的体外分析。
J Thorac Dis. 2012 Feb;4(1):40-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.05.02.
10
Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: chemosensitivity test and tissue markers as predictors of response to chemotherapy.腹膜癌转移来自卵巢癌:化疗敏感性测试和组织标志物可预测化疗反应。
J Transl Med. 2011 Jun 20;9:94. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-94.