Oncomedics SAS, 1 avenue d'ESTER, F-87069 Limoges, France.
Centre hospitalier universitaire Dupuytren, Service de chirurgie digestive, générale et endocrinienne, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, F-87042 Limoges, France.
Theranostics. 2021 Sep 21;11(19):9538-9556. doi: 10.7150/thno.55954. eCollection 2021.
As complex and heterogeneous diseases, cancers require a more tailored therapeutic management than most pathologies. Recent advances in anticancer drug development, including the immuno-oncology revolution, have been too often plagued by unsatisfying patient response rates and survivals. In reaction to this, cancer care has fully transitioned to the "personalized medicine" concept. Numerous tools are now available tools to better adapt treatments to the profile of each patient. They encompass a large array of diagnostic assays, based on biomarkers relevant to targetable molecular pathways. As a subfamily of such so-called companion diagnostics, chemosensitivity and resistance assays represent an attractive, yet insufficiently understood, approach to individualize treatments. They rely on the assessment of a composite biomarker, the functional response of cancer cells to drugs, to predict a patient's outcome. Systemic treatments, such as chemotherapies, as well as targeted treatments, whose efficacy cannot be fully predicted yet by other diagnostic tests, may be assessed through these means. The results can provide helpful information to assist clinicians in their decision-making process. We explore here the most advanced functional assays across oncology indications, with an emphasis on tests already displaying a convincing clinical demonstration. We then recapitulate the main technical obstacles faced by researchers and clinicians to produce more accurate, and thus more predictive, models and the recent advances that have been developed to circumvent them. Finally, we summarize the regulatory and quality frameworks surrounding functional assays to ensure their safe and performant clinical implementation. Functional assays are valuable diagnostic tools that already stand beyond the "proof-of-concept" stage. Clinical studies show they have a major role to play by themselves but also in conjunction with molecular diagnostics. They now need a final lift to fully integrate the common armament used against cancers, and thus make their way into the clinical routine.
作为复杂且异质性的疾病,癌症需要比大多数病理更具针对性的治疗管理。近年来,癌症药物研发取得了进展,包括免疫肿瘤学的革命,但患者的反应率和存活率仍不尽如人意。有鉴于此,癌症治疗已全面转向“个性化医学”的理念。现在有许多工具可用于更好地根据每位患者的特征来调整治疗方案。这些工具包括大量基于靶向分子途径相关生物标志物的诊断检测。作为所谓伴随诊断的一个亚家族,化疗敏感性和耐药性检测是一种有吸引力但尚未充分了解的个体化治疗方法。它们依赖于评估复合生物标志物,即癌细胞对药物的功能反应,以预测患者的治疗效果。可以通过这些方法来评估全身性治疗(如化疗)和靶向治疗(其疗效目前还不能通过其他诊断测试完全预测)。这些结果可以提供有用的信息,帮助临床医生做出决策。我们在这里探讨了肿瘤学各适应症中最先进的功能检测方法,重点介绍了已经具有令人信服的临床证据的检测方法。然后,我们总结了研究人员和临床医生在产生更准确、更具预测性的模型方面所面临的主要技术障碍,以及为克服这些障碍而开发的最新进展。最后,我们总结了功能检测的监管和质量框架,以确保其安全有效的临床应用。功能检测是有价值的诊断工具,已经超越了“概念验证”阶段。临床研究表明,它们具有重要的作用,不仅可以单独使用,还可以与分子诊断相结合。它们现在需要最后的提升,才能全面融入对抗癌症的常规武器,并最终进入临床常规。