Harf A, Bertrand C, Chang H K
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Jan;56(1):155-60. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.56.1.155.
The efficiency of ventilation by high-frequency oscillation (HFO) applied to the thorax (external HFO) has been compared with that of HFO applied through a tracheal cannula (internal HFO) in a group of normal rats. Anesthetized, paralyzed, tracheotomized rats were placed in a whole-body plethysmograph. External HFO was achieved by varying the pressure surrounding the animal by means of a piston pump connected to the body plethysmograph; internal HFO was obtained in the same animals by connecting the pump to the tracheal cannula. Arterial CO2 and O2 partial pressures were measured in blood sampled from a carotid artery and were compared for external and internal HFO applied at 20 Hz with matched tidal volumes of 0.8, 1.4, 1.9, and 2.4 ml/kg. With increasing tidal volume, the mean arterial CO2 partial pressure decreased progressively from 68 to 30 Torr and was identical in the two modes of HFO; no difference was noted for the CO2 elimination or for the arterial O2 partial pressure. These results indicate that, in terms of gas exchange, external and internal HFO are equally efficient in normal rats.
在一组正常大鼠中,对应用于胸部的高频振荡通气(HFO)(体外HFO)与通过气管插管应用的HFO(体内HFO)的效率进行了比较。将麻醉、麻痹并做了气管切开术的大鼠置于全身体积描记器中。体外HFO是通过连接到身体体积描记器的活塞泵改变动物周围的压力来实现的;体内HFO是通过将泵连接到气管插管在同一动物中获得的。测量从颈动脉采集的血液中的动脉二氧化碳和氧气分压,并对以20Hz频率应用、潮气量分别为0.8、1.4、1.9和2.4ml/kg的体外和体内HFO进行比较。随着潮气量增加,平均动脉二氧化碳分压从68托逐渐降至30托,且在两种HFO模式中相同;在二氧化碳清除或动脉氧分压方面未观察到差异。这些结果表明,就气体交换而言,体外和体内HFO在正常大鼠中效率相同。