King M, Phillips D M, Zidulka A, Chang H K
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Nov;130(5):703-6. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.5.703.
We compared the tracheal mucus clearance rate (TMCR) in anesthetized dogs during spontaneous breathing (SB), ventilation by high-frequency oscillation at the airway opening (HFO/AO), and ventilation by high-frequency oscillation of the chest wall (HFO/CW). The HFO/AO was carried out by using a piston pump with a high impedance transverse flow at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube; HFO/CW was effected by creating rapid pressure oscillations in an air-filled cuff wrapped around the lower thorax of the animal, causing small tidal volumes at the mouth. The TMCR was measured by observing the rate of displacement of a charcoal marker in the lower trachea; a fiberoptic bronchoscope was used to deposit the marker before each experiment and to relocate it after a 5-min run. In 7 dogs, mean TMCR during control (SB) was 8.9 +/- 3.5 mm/min. At 13 Hz with an oscillatory tidal volume (VTO) of 1.5 ml/kg, mean TMCR was 240% of control with HFO/CW (p less than 0.001) and 76% of control with HFO/AO (NS). During HFO/AO at 20 Hz and a VTO of 3 ml/kg, mean TMCR was 97% of control. We conclude that high-frequency ventilation by rapid chest wall compression enhances tracheal mucus clearance when compared with spontaneous breathing, whereas high-frequency oscillation at the mouth does not.
我们比较了麻醉犬在自主呼吸(SB)、气道开口处高频振荡通气(HFO/AO)和胸壁高频振荡通气(HFO/CW)期间的气管黏液清除率(TMCR)。HFO/AO是通过在气管导管近端使用具有高阻抗横向流的活塞泵来进行的;HFO/CW是通过在包裹动物下胸部的充气袖带中产生快速压力振荡来实现的,从而在口腔产生小潮气量。TMCR通过观察气管下部木炭标记物的移位速率来测量;在每次实验前使用纤维支气管镜放置标记物,并在运行5分钟后重新定位它。在7只犬中,对照(SB)期间的平均TMCR为8.9±3.5毫米/分钟。在13赫兹、振荡潮气量(VTO)为1.5毫升/千克时,HFO/CW时的平均TMCR为对照的240%(p<0.001),HFO/AO时为对照的76%(无显著性差异)。在20赫兹、VTO为3毫升/千克的HFO/AO期间,平均TMCR为对照的97%。我们得出结论,与自主呼吸相比,通过快速胸壁按压进行的高频通气可增强气管黏液清除,而口腔处的高频振荡则不能。