Horwitz R I, Stewart K R
Am J Med. 1984 Feb;76(2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90773-3.
In a case-control study using several distinctive control subgroups, no increased risk of breast cancer was found in postmenopausal women who used replacement estrogens. When breast cancer patients and control patients with no breast lesions were assembled from patients who had all received mammography, the overall odds ratio was 0.5, and varied from 0.2 to 1.2 according to the patient's indication for estrogen treatment and the clinical reason for mammography. When a biopsy registry was the source of breast cancer patients and control patients with benign breast disease, the odds ratio was 0.8. In a conventional case-control comparison of breast cancer patients with hospitalized patients having other diagnoses, the odds ratio was 0.9 when specific data about exposure were used to classify patients as estrogen users, but the odds ratio was 3.3 when data about exposure were not recorded equally in the compared groups. These results show that calculations of "risk" depend on important clinical phenomena that have not previously been given suitable attention. The data also provide a possible explanation for the perplexing findings among earlier studies in which the odds ratios varied from "protective" to "causal" values. When the data from the present study are partitioned according to differences in patients' clinical characteristics and reasons for the diagnostic breast procedure, the conflicting results of earlier studies can be reconciled.
在一项使用多个不同对照组的病例对照研究中,未发现使用替代雌激素的绝经后女性患乳腺癌的风险增加。当从所有接受过乳房X光检查的患者中选取乳腺癌患者和无乳房病变的对照患者时,总体比值比为0.5,根据患者雌激素治疗的指征和乳房X光检查的临床原因,该比值比在0.2至1.2之间变化。当活检登记处作为乳腺癌患者和患有良性乳腺疾病的对照患者的来源时,比值比为0.8。在乳腺癌患者与患有其他诊断的住院患者进行的传统病例对照比较中,当使用关于暴露的具体数据将患者分类为雌激素使用者时,比值比为0.9,但当在比较组中未平等记录关于暴露的数据时,比值比为3.3。这些结果表明,“风险”的计算取决于以前未得到适当关注的重要临床现象。这些数据还为早期研究中令人困惑的发现提供了一种可能的解释,在早期研究中,比值比从“保护”值到“因果”值不等。当根据患者的临床特征差异和诊断性乳房检查的原因对本研究的数据进行分类时,早期研究中相互矛盾的结果可以得到调和。