Salagaras S, Nettelbeck T
Am J Ment Defic. 1984 Jan;88(4):437-41.
Mentally retarded adult trainees (N = 370) at work preparation centers were rated by their supervisors on the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS). Results confirmed the reliability and criterion validity of the ABS, demonstrating its sensitivity to differences in adaptive and maladaptive behavior between subgroups representing variation in seven personal variables: age, sex, estimated intellectual ability, etiology, place of living, the presence or absence of any mobility handicap, and use of medications. Results were compared with those from a study of retarded adolescents attending school (Salagaras & Nettelbeck, 1983). On the average, trainees had a higher adaptive behavior profile than did students, but no significant differences were found in maladaptive behavior. The ABS measures indicated that about 75% of students were behaviorally prepared to make the transition to work preparation centers.
在工作准备中心的成年智障学员(N = 370)由其主管根据美国智力缺陷协会适应性行为量表(ABS)进行评分。结果证实了ABS的信度和效标效度,表明其对代表七个个人变量差异的亚组之间适应性和适应不良行为差异具有敏感性,这七个变量为:年龄、性别、估计的智力能力、病因、居住地点、是否存在任何行动障碍以及药物使用情况。将结果与一项针对上学的智障青少年的研究结果(Salagaras & Nettelbeck,1983)进行了比较。平均而言,学员的适应性行为概况高于学生,但在适应不良行为方面未发现显著差异。ABS测量表明,约75%的学生在行为上已准备好过渡到工作准备中心。