Feeney D A, Johnston G R, Hardy R M
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Jan 1;184(1):68-81.
An analysis was made of 17 cases of microscopically proven hepatic and splenic neoplasms, with the objective of describing the ultrasonographic findings and determining how interpretation of these findings contributed to the diagnosis and prognosis of these cases. The ultrasonographic appearance of these tumors ranged from focal, large (6 to 20 cm diameter) mixed hyperechoic/hypoechoic masses to multifocal (0.5 to 2.0 cm diameter) hypoechoic masses. The ultrasonographic appearance was not specific for the microscopic cell-type of the neoplasm. When the combined clinical, hematologic, serum chemical, and ultrasonographic findings were interpreted, neoplasia was always the primary consideration, but microscopic confirmation was mandatory. The uses of ultrasonography in these cases were: (1) to characterize the internal architecture of a mass identified radiographically, (2) to confirm the organ of origin of the mass, (3) to define the extent of disease in or around an affected organ, (4) to evaluate palpable abdominal mass(es) in the presence of poor abdominal radiographic contrast, and (5) to identify previously undetected or unsuspected metastases. Three interpretive errors were found, but only one would have influenced the prognosis for that specific patient.
对17例经显微镜检查证实的肝脾肿瘤病例进行了分析,目的是描述超声检查结果,并确定这些结果的解读如何有助于这些病例的诊断和预后判断。这些肿瘤的超声表现范围从局灶性、大的(直径6至20厘米)混合高回声/低回声肿块到多灶性(直径0.5至2.0厘米)低回声肿块。超声表现对于肿瘤的显微镜下细胞类型并不具有特异性。当综合临床、血液学、血清化学和超声检查结果进行解读时,肿瘤始终是首要考虑因素,但显微镜确诊是必不可少的。超声检查在这些病例中的用途包括:(1)描述经放射学检查发现的肿块的内部结构;(2)确认肿块的起源器官;(3)确定受累器官内或其周围疾病的范围;(4)在腹部放射学对比度差的情况下评估可触及的腹部肿块;(5)识别先前未检测到或未怀疑的转移灶。发现了3例解读错误,但只有1例会影响该特定患者的预后。