Hillenbrand J
J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jan;75(1):231-40. doi: 10.1121/1.390400.
It has been argued that perception of stop consonant voicing contrasts is based on auditory mechanisms responsible for the resolution of temporal order. As one source of evidence, category boundaries for nonspeech stimuli whose components vary in relative onset time are reasonably close to the labeling boundary for a labial stop voiced-voiceless continuum. However, voicing boundaries change considerably when the onset frequency of the first formant (F1) is varied--either directly or as a side effect of a change in F1 transition duration. Stimuli consisted of a midfrequency sinusoid that was initiated 0-50 ms prior to the onset of a low-frequency sinusoid. Results showed that the labeling boundary for relative onset time increased for longer durations of a low-frequency tone sweep. This effect is analogous to the F1 transition duration effect with synthetic speech. Further, the discrimination of differences in relative onset time was poorer for stimuli with longer frequency sweeps. However, unlike synthetic speech, there were no systematic effects when the frequency of a transitionless lower sinusoid was varied. These findings are discussed in relation to the potential contributions of auditory mechanisms and speech-specific processes in the perception of the voicing contrast.
有人认为,塞音浊音对比的感知是基于负责解决时间顺序的听觉机制。作为证据之一,其成分在相对起始时间上有所变化的非语音刺激的类别边界,与唇塞音浊音 - 清音连续统的标记边界相当接近。然而,当第一共振峰(F1)的起始频率发生变化时——无论是直接变化还是作为F1过渡持续时间变化的副作用,浊音边界都会发生相当大的变化。刺激由一个中频正弦波组成,该正弦波在低频正弦波开始前0 - 50毫秒启动。结果表明,低频音扫持续时间越长,相对起始时间的标记边界增加。这种效应类似于合成语音中的F1过渡持续时间效应。此外,对于频率扫频较长的刺激,相对起始时间差异的辨别能力较差。然而,与合成语音不同的是,当无过渡的较低频率正弦波的频率发生变化时,没有系统性影响。将结合听觉机制和语音特定过程在浊音对比感知中的潜在作用来讨论这些发现。