Suppr超能文献

[Comparison of antibacterial activities of cephalosporins].

作者信息

Kayser F H, Kohler M L

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Feb 4;114(5):156-61.

PMID:6701496
Abstract

2770 strains of Enterobacteriacea and of Acinetobacter were examined for susceptibility to cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftazidim, ceftriaxone, lamoxactam and cefotiam with the disk diffusion test. The percentage of susceptible strains was between 92% and 99%. Strains resistant to the new cephalosporins were more frequently observed in Enterobacter species, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris. A comparison with the activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin and cefuroxime showed the improvement which has been obtained by the development of the newer cephalosporins. Third generation cephalosporins showed variable activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Modal MICs of cefoperazone, cefsulodin and ceftazidim were between 2-4 mg/l, whereas mode MICs of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and lamoxactam were 16 mg/l. Of 591 examined Pseudomonas strains, 75, 90 and 96% respectively were susceptible to the first-named three derivatives in agar diffusion tests. Two to 60% of these cultures were susceptible to the second group of cephalosporins. These data show the unreliability of the disk test in testing Pseudomonas with these cephalosporins. Cefalothin, cefamandole and cefotiam were most active against staphylococci (mean MICs 0.25-0.5 mg/l). Lamoxactam, ceftazidim and cefsulodin showed only moderate activity (mean MICs 6.3-10.2 mg/l). All cephalosporins were inactive against enterococci, but showed good activity against streptococci and pneumococci.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison of antibacterial activities of cephalosporins].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Feb 4;114(5):156-61.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验