• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Comparison of antibacterial activities of cephalosporins].

作者信息

Kayser F H, Kohler M L

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Feb 4;114(5):156-61.

PMID:6701496
Abstract

2770 strains of Enterobacteriacea and of Acinetobacter were examined for susceptibility to cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftazidim, ceftriaxone, lamoxactam and cefotiam with the disk diffusion test. The percentage of susceptible strains was between 92% and 99%. Strains resistant to the new cephalosporins were more frequently observed in Enterobacter species, Serratia marcescens and Proteus vulgaris. A comparison with the activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin and cefuroxime showed the improvement which has been obtained by the development of the newer cephalosporins. Third generation cephalosporins showed variable activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Modal MICs of cefoperazone, cefsulodin and ceftazidim were between 2-4 mg/l, whereas mode MICs of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and lamoxactam were 16 mg/l. Of 591 examined Pseudomonas strains, 75, 90 and 96% respectively were susceptible to the first-named three derivatives in agar diffusion tests. Two to 60% of these cultures were susceptible to the second group of cephalosporins. These data show the unreliability of the disk test in testing Pseudomonas with these cephalosporins. Cefalothin, cefamandole and cefotiam were most active against staphylococci (mean MICs 0.25-0.5 mg/l). Lamoxactam, ceftazidim and cefsulodin showed only moderate activity (mean MICs 6.3-10.2 mg/l). All cephalosporins were inactive against enterococci, but showed good activity against streptococci and pneumococci.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison of antibacterial activities of cephalosporins].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1984 Feb 4;114(5):156-61.
2
[Activity of new beta-lactam antibiotics].[新型β-内酰胺类抗生素的活性]
Fortschr Med. 1982 May 20;100(19):888-92.
3
[In vitro antibacterial activity of cefodizime (HR 221) on 323 hospital strains of Gram negative bacilli. Comparison with cefotiam, cefoperazone, cefotetan and cefotaxime].头孢地嗪(HR 221)对323株医院革兰阴性杆菌的体外抗菌活性。与头孢替安、头孢哌酮、头孢替坦和头孢噻肟的比较
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 May;33(5):399-403.
4
[Comparative activity of cefsulodin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter and Enterobacteriaceae (author's transl)].头孢磺啶对铜绿假单胞菌、不动杆菌及肠杆菌科细菌的比较活性(作者译)
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Jun;30(6):432-9.
5
[Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cefalotin against 90 bacterial strains].头孢哌酮、头孢噻肟、头孢呋辛和头孢噻吩对90株细菌的最低抑菌浓度和杀菌浓度
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1982;61(4):309-19.
6
[In vitro effect of ceftriaxone on hospital bacteria. Line of regression and critical values].[头孢曲松对医院细菌的体外作用。回归线及临界值]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 Jun;33(5 Pt 2):473-6.
7
[Comparative study of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and moxalactam against 150 Gram negative strains (author's transl)].头孢曲松、头孢噻肟和拉氧头孢对150株革兰氏阴性菌的比较研究(作者译)
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Jun;30(6):341-4.
8
[In vitro activity of ceftriaxone on hospital bacteria. Results of a multicenter study].[头孢曲松对医院细菌的体外活性。一项多中心研究的结果]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 Jun;33(5 Pt 2):469-72.
9
[In vitro antibacterial activity of eight third generation cephalosporins (author's transl)].八种第三代头孢菌素的体外抗菌活性(作者译)
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Jun;30(6):363-9.
10
[In vitro activity of a new 3d-generation cephalosporin, cefodizime, on hospital bacteria].[新型第三代头孢菌素头孢地嗪对医院细菌的体外活性]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):561-6.