• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Venous access: a prospective, randomized study of the Hickman catheter.

作者信息

Wagman L D, Kirkemo A, Johnston M R

出版信息

Surgery. 1984 Mar;95(3):303-8.

PMID:6701786
Abstract

This prospective, randomized study evaluated the risks associated with the Hickman catheter (HC) by a comparison of rates of placement and use complication, infection, treatment failure, and thrombogenicity with a group of patients with polyvinylchloride central venous catheters (CVC). Complications were studied prospectively. The patient populations of the two groups were similar and most patients were entered in the study because of prior venoablation. No significant difference in complication rates was noted for catheter placement complications, infection, or treatment failures. No catheter-related deaths occurred. Seven CVCs were exchanged for malfunction and one HC fractured and required repair. Venography was performed in seven patients in each group when the catheter was removed. The incidence of fibrin sheath formation was significantly increased in the HC group (P less than 0.05). One venous thrombosis was identified in a patient with a CVC. A separate group of patients with HCs who were not placed in the randomized study was followed. This group had a significantly higher incidence of septic complications than did the study group (P less than 0.005). We conclude that the HC is as safe as is the CVC when the conditions of placement and maintenance are rigorously controlled.

摘要

相似文献

1
Venous access: a prospective, randomized study of the Hickman catheter.
Surgery. 1984 Mar;95(3):303-8.
2
Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.自体骨髓和外周干细胞移植期间硅胶导管的血栓形成并发症:Hickman导管与Groshong导管的前瞻性比较
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991 Jan;7(1):57-9.
3
Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.在一项对2595根导管进行的前瞻性观察研究中的中心静脉导管相关感染
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631-5. doi: 10.1186/cc3824. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
4
Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.希克曼导管的位置不当,左侧与右侧置管尝试。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2003 Feb;28(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/S1473-0502(02)00094-0.
5
Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.非隧道式硅橡胶导管感染率低且耐用性长。是长期静脉通路的一种安全且具成本效益的替代选择。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6.
6
A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.1201例癌症患者中两条中心静脉用于植入全植入式静脉通路装置的比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;34(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
7
Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.通过锁骨下静脉或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管为住院患者提供肠外营养所带来的并发症及费用。
Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;19(4):237-43. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0103.
8
Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.骨髓移植受者中心静脉导管敷料的比较
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Jun;23(5):829-36.
9
Central venous catheterization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.中心静脉置管:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2009 Feb;15(1):19-26. doi: 10.1177/1076029608319878. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
10
Comparison of catheter-related infection and tip colonization between internal jugular and subclavian central venous catheters in surgical neonates.外科新生儿颈内静脉与锁骨下中心静脉导管相关感染及尖端定植的比较。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):946-53. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000291443.78166.98.

引用本文的文献

1
Inadvertent Central Arterial Catheterization: An Unusual Cause of Ischemic Stroke.意外的中心动脉插管:缺血性中风的一个不寻常原因。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):155-158. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_460_17.
2
Central venous line and acute neurological deficit: a case series.中心静脉置管与急性神经功能缺损:病例系列
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2014;9(4):186-90. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
3
Retention of lepirudin at the tip of a silicone catheter: a better catheter flush solution?硅酮导管尖端对水蛭素的保留:一种更好的导管冲洗溶液?
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Apr;12(4):278-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0592-7. Epub 2004 Feb 13.
4
Comparison between peripherally implanted ports and externally sited catheters for long-term venous access.外周植入式端口与外置导管用于长期静脉通路的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1):33-8.
5
Catheter-related septic central venous thrombosis--current therapeutic options.导管相关的感染性中心静脉血栓形成——当前的治疗选择
West J Med. 1986 Aug;145(2):200-3.