• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低词汇量受试者的压力与唤醒情绪量表:对麦凯等人(1978年)研究的重新修订

A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary subjects: a reworking of Mackay et al. (1978).

作者信息

Cruickshank P J

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 1984 Feb;75 ( Pt 1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb02792.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb02792.x
PMID:6704636
Abstract

In an experiment investigating patient mood in an out-patient setting, a Mood Adjective Checklist (Mackay et al., 1978) was administered to 189 patients before and after their consultations, obtaining 366 completed questionnaires. Both the stress and arousal scales in the Mackay et al. checklist contain unequal numbers of positive and negative items, and are thus subject to response bias. When the results were analysed, it was noted that some items in the checklist led to large numbers of question mark responses, and it was discovered that word frequency, used as an estimate of word unfamiliarity, was correlated with the use of the question mark. Furthermore, when question mark responses were treated as missing data, as recommended by Meddis (1972), the factor analytic distinction between stress and arousal disappeared. Next, items giving rise to 15 per cent or more question mark responses were omitted from analysis, and the remaining items factor analysed. The resulting checklist comprised nine high stress items, nine low stress items, four high arousal items and four low arousal items. Mackay et al.'s stress and arousal scales were reconstructed using these items; they were no longer subject to response bias, and were more accessible to low vocabulary subjects.

摘要

在一项针对门诊患者情绪的实验中,在189名患者就诊前后分别使用了一份情绪形容词检查表(麦凯等人,1978年),共获得366份完整的问卷。麦凯等人的检查表中的压力和唤醒量表包含数量不等的积极和消极项目,因此容易受到反应偏差的影响。在分析结果时,注意到检查表中的一些项目导致大量的问号回答,并且发现用作单词不熟悉度估计的词频与问号的使用相关。此外,按照梅迪斯(1972年)的建议,将问号回答视为缺失数据时,压力和唤醒之间的因素分析区别消失了。接下来,分析时省略了产生15%或更多问号回答的项目,并对其余项目进行因素分析。最终的检查表包括九个高压力项目、九个低压力项目、四个高唤醒项目和四个低唤醒项目。使用这些项目重建了麦凯等人的压力和唤醒量表;它们不再受反应偏差的影响,并且对于词汇量低的受试者来说更容易理解。

相似文献

1
A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary subjects: a reworking of Mackay et al. (1978).低词汇量受试者的压力与唤醒情绪量表:对麦凯等人(1978年)研究的重新修订
Br J Psychol. 1984 Feb;75 ( Pt 1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb02792.x.
2
Measurement of stress and arousal: validation of the stress/arousal adjective checklist.压力与唤醒的测量:压力/唤醒形容词检查表的验证
Br J Psychol. 1983 Nov;74 (Pt 4):473-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01880.x.
3
The measurement of self-reported stress and arousal.
Br J Psychol. 1985 May;76 ( Pt 2):183-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01941.x.
4
Morningness-eveningness and diurnal variations in self-reported mood.晨型-夜型与自我报告情绪的昼夜变化
J Psychol. 1983 Mar;113(2d Half):251-6. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1983.9923583.
5
Assessing the consultation: method for measuring changes in patient stress and arousal.评估会诊:测量患者压力和唤醒水平变化的方法。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jun 2;288(6431):1657-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6431.1657.
6
[Development of the Emotion and Arousal Checklist (EACL)].[情绪与觉醒检查表(EACL)的编制]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2015 Feb;85(6):579-89. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13231.
7
An Autonomic Nervous System Response Inventory (ANSRI): scaling, reliability, and cross-validation.
J Behav Med. 1984 Sep;7(3):315-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00845363.
8
Item order effects in the evaluation of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom structure.创伤后应激障碍症状结构评估中的项目顺序效应
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):852-64. doi: 10.1037/pas0000089. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
The measurement of psychological states by use of factors derived from a combination of items from mood and symptom checklists.通过使用从情绪和症状清单的项目组合中得出的因素来测量心理状态。
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jul;34(3):677-85. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197807)34:3<677::aid-jclp2270340320>3.0.co;2-t.
10
[Semantic dimensions of vocabulary for emotional concepts].[情感概念词汇的语义维度]
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(3):478-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Epinephrine and cortisol responses to work: a test of the models of Frankenhaeuser and Karasek.
Ann Behav Med. 1996 Fall;18(4):229-37. doi: 10.1007/BF02895284.