Cruickshank P J
Br J Psychol. 1984 Feb;75 ( Pt 1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb02792.x.
In an experiment investigating patient mood in an out-patient setting, a Mood Adjective Checklist (Mackay et al., 1978) was administered to 189 patients before and after their consultations, obtaining 366 completed questionnaires. Both the stress and arousal scales in the Mackay et al. checklist contain unequal numbers of positive and negative items, and are thus subject to response bias. When the results were analysed, it was noted that some items in the checklist led to large numbers of question mark responses, and it was discovered that word frequency, used as an estimate of word unfamiliarity, was correlated with the use of the question mark. Furthermore, when question mark responses were treated as missing data, as recommended by Meddis (1972), the factor analytic distinction between stress and arousal disappeared. Next, items giving rise to 15 per cent or more question mark responses were omitted from analysis, and the remaining items factor analysed. The resulting checklist comprised nine high stress items, nine low stress items, four high arousal items and four low arousal items. Mackay et al.'s stress and arousal scales were reconstructed using these items; they were no longer subject to response bias, and were more accessible to low vocabulary subjects.
在一项针对门诊患者情绪的实验中,在189名患者就诊前后分别使用了一份情绪形容词检查表(麦凯等人,1978年),共获得366份完整的问卷。麦凯等人的检查表中的压力和唤醒量表包含数量不等的积极和消极项目,因此容易受到反应偏差的影响。在分析结果时,注意到检查表中的一些项目导致大量的问号回答,并且发现用作单词不熟悉度估计的词频与问号的使用相关。此外,按照梅迪斯(1972年)的建议,将问号回答视为缺失数据时,压力和唤醒之间的因素分析区别消失了。接下来,分析时省略了产生15%或更多问号回答的项目,并对其余项目进行因素分析。最终的检查表包括九个高压力项目、九个低压力项目、四个高唤醒项目和四个低唤醒项目。使用这些项目重建了麦凯等人的压力和唤醒量表;它们不再受反应偏差的影响,并且对于词汇量低的受试者来说更容易理解。