Roman E
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Mar;38(1):29-35. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.1.29.
Much of the recent controversy surrounding the relation between fetal death and pregnancy order has centred around the appropriateness of different types of analyses. In the present paper the interpretation of various methods are discussed with reference to "real" and "hypothetical" data. The pattern of results obtained when the fetal loss rates of a group of pregnancies are tabulated by pregnancy order was found to depend on the risk and parity distributions of the study population. These two parameters did not, however, appear to affect the within "sibship" or "gravidity" group patterns. These findings support the hypothesis that the frequently observed increase in fetal death rates in pregnancy orders above two could be largely artifactual. It is concluded that in any investigation of reproductive events women, and not their pregnancies, should form the prime unit of analyses.
近期围绕胎儿死亡与妊娠顺序之间关系的诸多争议主要集中在不同类型分析方法的适用性上。在本文中,将结合“实际”和“假设”数据来讨论各种方法的解释。当按照妊娠顺序将一组妊娠的胎儿丢失率制成表格时,发现所获得的结果模式取决于研究人群的风险和产次分布。然而,这两个参数似乎并未影响“同胞关系”或“妊娠次数”组内的模式。这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即经常观察到的妊娠顺序超过二胎时胎儿死亡率的增加可能在很大程度上是人为造成的。得出的结论是,在任何关于生殖事件的调查中,分析的基本单位应该是女性,而不是她们的妊娠情况。