Wen C P, Tsai S P, Gibson R L, McClellan W A
J Occup Med. 1984 Feb;26(2):118-27.
In occupational epidemiology a retrospective cohort study normally includes active, terminated, and retired employees and the mortality results may vary considerably if any of the three groups is excluded from the study. From a large refinery cohort of 12,526 white male workers followed between January, 1937 and January, 1978, the mortality experience of three groups (the active, terminated and retired) has been examined; detailed results, along with the merits and problems of studying these groups separately, are presented. The standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all causes are 0.68, 1.04 and 0.89 for the active, the terminated and the retired, respectively, and for all cancer, 0.85, 0.98 and 1.05. Significantly decreased SMRs are seen for most of the causes among the active and may be attributed to the "healthy worker effect." Exclusive study of active workers, although it may yield certain useful information, particularly on diseases of the young and those with short latency periods, is primarily a study of the healthy worker effect. Many favorable effects of the active worker will be encountered. The retirees as a whole experienced no significant excess mortality for any causes, although examination of a subgroup, the early retirees, did reveal a significant excess of deaths from diseases of the nervous system and sense organs. The retired may appear to be an ideal group for study because they usually have worked for an extended period of time, they may have experienced long-term occupational exposure and they have lived long enough to develop diseases with long latency periods; however, serious problems arise from studying only the retirees and these are discussed. The terminated group contributed 41% of the person-years, 49% of the total number of individuals and 38% of the deaths and is far too important to be omitted. Contrary to previous reports, the terminated did not demonstrate a significantly adverse mortality experience when compared with the general population, although they did not show the healthy worker effect that was seen among the active.
在职业流行病学中,一项回顾性队列研究通常涵盖在职、已离职和退休员工,如果将这三组中的任何一组排除在研究之外,死亡率结果可能会有很大差异。在一个由12526名白人男性工人组成的大型炼油厂队列中,对1937年1月至1978年1月期间的在职、已离职和退休三组人员的死亡情况进行了调查;文中呈现了详细结果,以及分别研究这些组别的优点和问题。所有原因的标准化死亡比(SMR)在职组、已离职组和退休组中分别为0.68、1.04和0.89,所有癌症的标准化死亡比分别为0.85、0.98和1.05。在职组中大多数原因的标准化死亡比显著降低,这可能归因于“健康工人效应”。仅对在职工人进行研究,尽管可能会得出某些有用信息,特别是关于年轻人和潜伏期短的疾病,但主要是对健康工人效应的研究。会遇到许多在职工人的有利影响。退休人员总体上在任何原因方面均未出现显著的超额死亡率,不过对一个亚组(提前退休人员)的调查确实显示,神经系统和感觉器官疾病导致的死亡显著超额。退休人员似乎是理想的研究群体,因为他们通常工作了很长时间,可能经历了长期职业暴露,并且寿命足够长,足以患上潜伏期长的疾病;然而,仅研究退休人员会出现严重问题,本文对此进行了讨论。已离职组贡献了41%的人年数、49%的个体总数和38%的死亡数,其重要性不容忽视。与之前的报告相反,已离职组与一般人群相比,并未表现出显著不利的死亡情况,尽管他们没有表现出在职组中所见的健康工人效应。