Zinman R, Gaultier C
Respir Physiol. 1984 Jan;55(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(84)90115-4.
The relationship of abdominothoracic configuration (AT config) to maximal static inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressure (Pimax, Pemax) was studied in 9 children. Pmax manoeuvres were performed from the relaxed end-expiratory position (FRC relax) and after contracting the abdomen (Abd) and expanding the rib cage (RC), (FRC isovol). Anteroposterior diameters (AP) of RC and Abd during Pmax were measured with magnetometers and compared to AT config at FRC relax. During both Pimax and Pemax from FRC relax the RC AP increased and Abd AP decreased. The pressures generated did not correlate with the change in either diameter. Moving to FRC isovol prior to the onset of pressure generation had no effect on AT config obtained for Pemax, but for Pimax resulted in further increase in RC AP and decrease in Abd AP as compared to FRC relax. Despite these differences in AT config, Pimax was not significantly affected. This suggests that changes in AT config expected to place the diaphragm at a mechanical advantage were countered by an opposite effect on the other inspiratory muscles. Because the AT config for Pemax was fixed, there appears to be a unique balance of forces between the expiratory muscles acting on the rib cage and the abdomen during a maximal static expiratory effort.
在9名儿童中研究了腹胸构型(AT构型)与最大静态吸气和呼气口腔压力(Pimax、Pemax)之间的关系。Pmax动作是从呼气末放松位置(FRC放松)以及在收缩腹部(Abd)和扩张胸廓(RC)后(FRC等容)进行的。在Pmax期间,用磁力计测量RC和Abd的前后径(AP),并与FRC放松时的AT构型进行比较。在从FRC放松进行Pimax和Pemax期间,RC的AP增加而Abd的AP减小。所产生的压力与任一径的变化均无相关性。在压力产生开始前移动到FRC等容对Pemax所获得的AT构型没有影响,但对于Pimax,与FRC放松相比,导致RC的AP进一步增加而Abd的AP减小。尽管AT构型存在这些差异,但Pimax并未受到显著影响。这表明预期使膈肌处于机械优势的AT构型变化被对其他吸气肌的相反作用所抵消。因为Pemax的AT构型是固定的,所以在最大静态呼气努力期间,作用于胸廓和腹部的呼气肌之间似乎存在独特的力平衡。