Suppr超能文献

欣克利裁决后公众对法医精神病学的看法。

Public opinion of forensic psychiatry following the Hinckley verdict.

作者信息

Slater D, Hans V P

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1984 May;141(5):675-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.5.675.

Abstract

The authors obtained opinions of forensic psychiatry in a community survey following the not guilty by reason of insanity verdict in the Hinckley trial. A majority of respondents expressed little or no confidence in the specific psychiatric testimony in the Hinckley trial and only modest faith in the general ability of psychiatrists to determine legal insanity. Respondents' general and specific attitudes were strongly related. Younger people and women were more positive in their views of psychiatry in the courtroom.

摘要

在欣克利案审判中作出因精神错乱而无罪的裁决后,作者们在一项社区调查中获取了法医精神病学方面的意见。大多数受访者对欣克利案审判中的具体精神病学证词表示很少或根本没有信心,对精神病医生判定法律上精神错乱的一般能力也只是稍有信心。受访者的总体态度和具体态度密切相关。年轻人和女性对法庭上精神病学的看法更为积极。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验