Mittag T W, Xu X, Moshoyiannis H, Kornfeld P, Genkins G
Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1984 May;31(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(84)90239-3.
Possible causes for the failure of immunoassays to detect anti-acetylcholine receptor activity in serum from confirmed myasthenia gravis (MG) patients were investigated. A more sensitive assay, using Protein A to trap immune complexes (ARIA), was applied to 65 MG sera which were negative in the usual assay and to 42 normal human sera. Normal and negative MG sera had antibody (Ab) activity in the same range (50-70 pM). Titers present in 70% of normal sera appeared to be specific antireceptor antibodies as defined by tests for antigen specificity. Thus, higher sensitivity assays did not improve discrimination of MG from normals. In a second group of 108 MG sera studied, 48 were negative by the usual assay criteria in a rat acetylcholine receptor immunoassay. Further detailed analysis of this negative group showed that 3/48 had IgG3 antibody not detectable in the test, 14/48 had Ab's recognizing human receptor determinants exclusively, 29/48 had toxin blocking Ab's not determined by immunoassays, and 6/48 were negative in all tests. The results indicate that the exclusive occurrence of toxin-blocking antibodies in MG subjects is a major factor contributing to false negatives in the ARIA test. Estimates of the amount of Ab's with this functionality indicated that they are present in very much smaller amounts than other classes of anti-receptor Ab's. Degree of blocking activity in patient serum showed a fair correlation with severity of disease. Thus, blocking antibodies appear capable of causing all degrees of disease severity in the absence of other types of antireceptor Ab's. The development of a sensitive and quantitative in vitro assay for blocking antibodies combined with the usual immunoassay would be a major improvement for a MG diagnostic test, with greater than 94% positivity predicted.
对免疫测定法未能检测出确诊的重症肌无力(MG)患者血清中抗乙酰胆碱受体活性的可能原因进行了研究。一种更灵敏的检测方法,即使用蛋白A捕获免疫复合物的方法(ARIA),应用于65份在常规检测中呈阴性的MG血清以及42份正常人血清。正常血清和MG阴性血清中的抗体(Ab)活性处于相同范围(50 - 70 pM)。通过抗原特异性检测确定,70%的正常血清中的滴度似乎是特异性抗受体抗体。因此,更高灵敏度的检测方法并未改善MG患者与正常人之间的鉴别。在研究的第二组108份MG血清中,48份在大鼠乙酰胆碱受体免疫测定中按照常规检测标准呈阴性。对这一阴性组的进一步详细分析表明,48份中有3份含有在检测中无法检测到的IgG3抗体,48份中有14份仅识别人类受体决定簇的抗体,48份中有29份含有免疫测定法未检测到的毒素阻断抗体,48份中有6份在所有检测中均为阴性。结果表明,MG患者中仅出现毒素阻断抗体是导致ARIA检测出现假阴性的主要因素。对具有这种功能的抗体量的估计表明,它们的含量比其他类型的抗受体抗体少得多。患者血清中的阻断活性程度与疾病严重程度有一定相关性。因此,在没有其他类型抗受体抗体的情况下,阻断抗体似乎能够导致各种程度的疾病严重程度。开发一种针对阻断抗体的灵敏且定量的体外检测方法,并结合常规免疫测定法,将是MG诊断检测的一项重大改进,预计阳性率超过94%。