Meyers P, Qualtiere L F
J Immunol. 1977 May;118(5):1541-8.
Normal chickens and chickens congenitally infected with an avian leukosis virus (ALV) of antigenic subgroup A were challenged with strains of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) of two different antigenic subgroups (B and C) and tumor induction and growth as well as humoral antibody to viral envelope antigen (VEA) and tumor-specific surface antigen (TSSA) were measured. There was no effect of congenital ALV infection on RSV tumor incidence or latent period but the growth rate and size of the tumors were much higher in congenitally infected birds as compared to controls. Whereas most tumors in the RSV-challenged normal birds regressed, tumors in ALV-infected birds grew progressively. There were no striking differences in the number of birds in either group in the incidence of anti-TSSA or anti-VEA antibodies nor did the presence of either type of antibody reflect the tumor status of the host.
用两种不同抗原亚组(B和C)的劳氏肉瘤病毒(RSV)毒株对正常鸡和先天性感染A抗原亚组禽白血病病毒(ALV)的鸡进行攻击,并检测肿瘤诱导和生长情况以及针对病毒包膜抗原(VEA)和肿瘤特异性表面抗原(TSSA)的体液抗体。先天性ALV感染对RSV肿瘤发生率或潜伏期没有影响,但与对照组相比,先天性感染禽类的肿瘤生长速度和大小要高得多。在RSV攻击的正常禽类中,大多数肿瘤会消退,而在ALV感染的禽类中,肿瘤会逐渐生长。两组中抗TSSA或抗VEA抗体发生率的鸟类数量没有显著差异,两种类型抗体的存在也不能反映宿主的肿瘤状态。