• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of click duration of the latency of the early evoked response.

作者信息

Beattie R C, Boyd R

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Mar;27(1):70-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2701.70.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2701.70
PMID:6717010
Abstract

The effect of click duration on the latency of waves I, III, and V was investigated by testing 20 normal-hearing subjects at 60 dB HL using electric pulses of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 microseconds. Alternating condensation and rarefaction clicks were used. The results revealed similar and nonsignificant latency differences for the 25-, 50-, and 100-microseconds pulses. However, the 100 microseconds duration is preferred to the 25-microseconds pulse because the latter reduced the maximum measurable hearing loss by about 13 dB. The results also showed that latencies increased approximately 0.10 ms as duration increased from 100 to 200 microseconds and by 0.20 ms when duration increased from 100 to 400 microseconds. Although such differences by themselves are small, they can combine with other stimulus or recording variables to be clinically significant. Therefore, it is important to control click duration when normative data are generated. A second experiment was conducted to assess the interaction of polarity (condensation, rarefaction, and alternating) and pulse duration (100 and 400 microseconds) on the wave V latency. These data revealed no latency differences among polarities at either duration.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of click duration of the latency of the early evoked response.
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Mar;27(1):70-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2701.70.
2
On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. III. Latencies in cochlear hearing loss.关于点击诱发的脑干电反应在听力学诊断中的应用。III. 耳蜗性听力损失中的潜伏期
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(1):3-11. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076156.
3
Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
Scand Audiol. 1988;17(2):99-109. doi: 10.3109/01050398809070698.
4
On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.关于点击诱发脑干电反应在听力学诊断中的应用。IV. 耳蜗性听力损失中的双耳潜伏期差异(V波)
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(2):67-73. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076164.
5
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.极性刺激对脑干听觉诱发电位的影响。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep-Oct;74(5):725-730. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5.
6
On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.关于点击诱发脑干电反应在听力学诊断中的应用。I. 正常反应的变异性。
Scand Audiol. 1978;7(4):193-205. doi: 10.3109/01050397809076287.
7
Influence of click sound pressure direction on brain stem responses in children.
Audiology. 1980;19(3):245-54. doi: 10.3109/00206098009072666.
8
Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.婴儿气导和骨导短纯音听觉脑干反应在听力损失分类中的应用及其与行为阈值的关系。
Ear Hear. 2009 Jun;30(3):350-68. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819f3145.
9
Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?
Scand Audiol. 1983;12(1):11-4. doi: 10.3109/01050398309076219.
10
The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses.
Scand Audiol. 1984;13(2):119-27. doi: 10.3109/01050398409043050.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.随机刺激率对听觉脑干反应测量的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 20;14:78. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00078. eCollection 2020.