Geary D C, Gilger J W
Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Feb;58(1):115-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.1.115.
17 academically normal and 17 reading disabled children were matched on Full Scale IQ and compared on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery-Children's Revision. The academically normal group performed significantly better on the Expressive Language, Writing, Reading, and Rhythm subscales, which suggests that the Luria-Nebraska may be sensitive to deficits not reflected in Full Scale IQ. Results are consistent with previous research and support the validity of the Luria-Nebraska, although simplistic interpretation of the battery's subscales should be avoided.
17名学业正常儿童和17名阅读障碍儿童在全量表智商上进行了匹配，并使用鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验儿童修订版进行了比较。学业正常组在表达性语言、书写、阅读和韵律分量表上的表现明显更好，这表明鲁利亚-内布拉斯加测验可能对全量表智商未反映出的缺陷敏感。研究结果与先前的研究一致，并支持鲁利亚-内布拉斯加测验的有效性，不过应避免对该成套测验的分量表进行简单化解释。
