Cernovsky Z Z
Percept Mot Skills. 1984 Feb;58(1):39-49. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.1.39.
Scales to assess nightmare recall frequency and recalled frequency of insomnia-related disorders (sleep onset, sleep-maintenance problems, unrefreshing sleep, and restless sleep) were administered, together with the Social Readjustment Rating Scale of Holmes and Rahe to 170 part-time undergraduate students (mean age 27.4 yr., 97 men, 73 women), and together with the Life Events Inventory of Tennant and Andrews to another sample of 91 part-time undergraduates (mean age 26 yr., 53 men, 37 women). The time span for which life events and sleep disorders were to be assessed was the previous 6 mo. Pearson rs suggested that the relationships of different types of scores for life events (scores for change, for distress, for amount of control over events, weighted and unweighted scores for negative and positive events) to reports of sleep disorders were mostly weak (the largest coefficient was .29) and nonsignificant. Of all life events measures, negative life events listed on the Readjustment Scale were the most closely associated with reports of sleep disorders; all 14 coefficients involving negative events were significant and in the clinically expected direction. Further research is needed to examine whether the size of correlations between events and sleep disorders is related to factors such as readiness to recall and report negative personal experiences.
我们对170名本科兼职学生（平均年龄27.4岁，97名男性，73名女性）施测了用于评估噩梦回忆频率以及失眠相关障碍（入睡、睡眠维持问题、睡眠无恢复感和睡眠不安）回忆频率的量表，同时施测了霍姆斯和拉赫的社会再适应评定量表；对另外91名本科兼职学生（平均年龄26岁，53名男性，37名女性）施测了用于评估噩梦回忆频率以及失眠相关障碍（入睡、睡眠维持问题、睡眠无恢复感和睡眠不安）回忆频率的量表，同时施测了坦南特和安德鲁斯的生活事件量表。评估生活事件和睡眠障碍的时间跨度为前6个月。皮尔逊积差相关系数表明，生活事件不同类型得分（变化得分、苦恼得分、对事件的控制量得分、正负性事件的加权和未加权得分）与睡眠障碍报告之间的关系大多较弱（最大系数为0.29）且无统计学意义。在所有生活事件测量指标中，再适应量表上列出的负性生活事件与睡眠障碍报告的关联最为密切；涉及负性事件的所有14个系数均具有统计学意义，且方向符合临床预期。需要进一步研究来检验事件与睡眠障碍之间的相关程度是否与诸如回忆和报告负面个人经历的意愿等因素有关。
