Teale D M, Rees R C, Clark A, Potter C W
Int J Cancer. 1984 May 15;33(5):701-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910330523.
The immunogenicity of a herpesvirus hominis type-2-transformed hamster cell line (HSV-2-333-2-26) of low spontaneous metastatic ability was compared with that of its two in vivo-derived sublines of increased metastatic potential. The parent (HSV-2-333-2-26) tumour was immunogenic as assessed by protection against tumour challenge afforded by implantation of irradiated tumour cells or tissue. In contrast, the two metastatic sublines, designated Met A and Met B, were non-immunogenic as defined by the above critera . However, the parent Met A and Met B tumours were shown to possess a common antigen(s), since immunization with irradiated parent tumour cells afforded protection to challenge with Met A or Met B. Immunization with the metastatic sublines, however, gave no protection to homologous or heterologous tumour challenge. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) inoculated in admixture with irradiated tumour cells and followed 7 days later by one immunization with X-irradiated tumour cells alone, increased host immunocompetence to subsequent homologous or cross-tumour cell challenge with parent, Met A or Met B cells. The immunity raised by using BCG plus irradiated tumour cells was shown to be specific to antigens expressed on the HSV-2 parent cell line and its metastatic sublines. In addition, BCG admixed with live inocula of parent, Met A or Met B cells induced contact suppression of in vivo tumour growth of the parent cells, but not of Met A or Met B cells. It is suggested from these studies that the parent tumour possesses a tumour-specific transplantation antigen(s) ( TSTAs ) which is not functionally active on its metastatically derived sublines. Common antigens, shared between the parent and Met A and Met B cells, are detectable by cross-challenge experiments, but they themselves appear not to be immunologically offensive. The loss of immunogenicity is discussed as a possible mechanism for the in vivo selection of sublines with increased metastatic potential.
将低自发转移能力的人疱疹病毒2型转化仓鼠细胞系(HSV - 2 - 333 - 2 - 26)的免疫原性与其两个体内衍生的具有更高转移潜能的亚系进行了比较。通过植入经辐照的肿瘤细胞或组织所提供的对肿瘤攻击的保护作用评估,亲本(HSV - 2 - 333 - 2 - 26)肿瘤具有免疫原性。相比之下,按照上述标准定义,两个转移亚系,即Met A和Met B,是非免疫原性的。然而,亲本、Met A和Met B肿瘤显示具有共同抗原,因为用经辐照的亲本肿瘤细胞免疫可对Met A或Met B的攻击提供保护。然而,用转移亚系免疫对同源或异源肿瘤攻击均无保护作用。将卡介苗(BCG)与经辐照的肿瘤细胞混合接种,7天后再单独用X射线辐照的肿瘤细胞进行一次免疫,可增强宿主对随后用亲本、Met A或Met B细胞进行的同源或跨肿瘤细胞攻击的免疫能力。使用BCG加经辐照肿瘤细胞所引发的免疫显示对HSV - 2亲本细胞系及其转移亚系上表达的抗原具有特异性。此外,BCG与亲本、Met A或Met B细胞的活接种物混合可诱导对亲本细胞体内肿瘤生长的接触抑制,但对Met A或Met B细胞则无此作用。从这些研究中推测,亲本肿瘤具有一种肿瘤特异性移植抗原(TSTA),该抗原在其转移衍生的亚系上无功能活性。通过交叉攻击实验可检测到亲本与Met A和Met B细胞之间共有的共同抗原,但它们本身似乎并无免疫攻击性。免疫原性的丧失被讨论为体内选择具有更高转移潜能亚系的一种可能机制。