Rosenthal E, Carroll D, Vincent R, Chamberlain D A
Int J Cardiol. 1984 Apr;5(4):441-7. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(84)90079-2.
Twelve samples of ventricular fibrillation were fed into nine automated external defibrillator-pacemakers ( AEDP , "Heart Aid") of recent design. All the devices recognised and defibrillated ventricular fibrillation in seven of the samples within 30 sec. None of the devices reacted to two of the samples; in the remaining three there was inter-device variation ranging from an appropriate response to no response, as well as inappropriate pacing or delay in recognition and treatment. Poor recognition of some ventricular fibrillation waveforms with considerable inter-device variation limits the usefulness of this model. A new prototype responded more consistently and future models may be of value in community resuscitation. The difficulty of evaluating the diagnostic capability of AEDP devices in clinical use makes comprehensive laboratory testing essential prior to release.
将12份室颤样本输入9台最新设计的自动体外除颤起搏器(AEDP,“心脏救助器”)。所有设备在30秒内识别并除颤了7份样本中的室颤。没有一台设备对其中2份样本做出反应;在其余3份样本中,设备间存在差异,从做出适当反应到无反应,以及不适当的起搏或识别与治疗延迟。对一些室颤波形识别不佳且设备间差异很大,限制了该模型的实用性。一种新的原型机反应更一致,未来的型号可能在社区复苏中具有价值。在临床使用中评估AEDP设备诊断能力的困难使得在发布前进行全面的实验室测试至关重要。