Suppr超能文献

采用两种液相色谱法测定花生酱中的黄曲霉毒素:协同研究

Determination of aflatoxins in peanut butter, using two liquid chromatographic methods: collaborative study.

作者信息

Campbell A D, Francis O J, Beebe R A, Stoloff L

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1984 Mar-Apr;67(2):312-6.

PMID:6725201
Abstract

Two methods for determining aflatoxins in peanut butter, one using normal phase and the other reverse phase liquid chromatography (LC), were studied by 8 and 10 collaborators, respectively. Fluorescence detection was used for the determinative step in both methods. For reverse phase LC, aflatoxins B1 and G1 were converted to B2a and G2a; for normal phase LC, a silica gel-packed flow cell was placed in the irradiating light path of the detector. The samples included spiked and naturally contaminated peanut butter with total aflatoxin levels from about 5 to 20 ng/g and controls in a balanced pair design. For the normal phase LC method, recoveries of B1, B2, G1, and G2 from spiked samples averaged 79, 92, 74, and 88%, respectively; for the reverse phase method, the recoveries were 103, 104, 89, and 163%. For the normal phase LC method, pooled repeatabilities were 20, 23, 28, and 17% for B1, B2, G1, and G2, respectively; for the reverse phase method, the repeatabilities were 19, 22, 38, and 31%. For the normal phase method, pooled reproducibilities were 34, 33, 39, and 34% for B1, B2, G1, and G2, respectively; for the reverse phase method, the reproducibilities were 32, 46, 51, and 52%. Both methods show an improved limit of detection and better within-laboratory precision over current AOAC methods; however, between-laboratory precision is no better, and the reverse phase method shows evidence of interferences being measured. For these reasons and because of no benefits of present value, neither method was submitted for adoption as official first action.

摘要

分别有8位和10位合作者研究了两种测定花生酱中黄曲霉毒素的方法,一种使用正相液相色谱法,另一种使用反相液相色谱法(LC)。两种方法的测定步骤均采用荧光检测。对于反相液相色谱法,黄曲霉毒素B1和G1被转化为B2a和G2a;对于正相液相色谱法,在检测器的照射光路中放置一个填充硅胶的流通池。样品包括添加了黄曲霉毒素的花生酱和天然受污染的花生酱,总黄曲霉毒素水平约为5至20 ng/g,以及采用平衡配对设计的对照样品。对于正相液相色谱法,添加样品中B1、B2、G1和G2的回收率平均分别为79%、92%、74%和88%;对于反相法,回收率分别为103%、104%、89%和163%。对于正相液相色谱法,B1、B2、G1和G2的合并重复性分别为20%、23%、28%和17%;对于反相法,重复性分别为19%、22%、38%和31%。对于正相法,B1、B2、G1和G2的合并再现性分别为34%、33%、39%和34%;对于反相法,再现性分别为32%、46%、51%和52%。与现行的美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)方法相比,这两种方法的检测限均有所提高,实验室内部精密度也更好;然而,实验室间精密度并无改善,且反相法显示出存在干扰物被检测到的迹象。基于这些原因,并且由于目前没有实际价值,两种方法均未提交作为官方首次行动方法采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验