Burgess P M, Campbell I M, Zylberberg A
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Mar;40(2):499-504. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<499::aid-jclp2270400219>3.0.co;2-y.
The distinction between item subtlety and face validity ( Holden & Jackson, 1979) provided the basis to reevaluate findings for subtle items in the MMPI D scale (N = 214). Results indicated that the inclusion of nonpathological items in the D scale did not lead to greater predictive validity of depression criteria. The need for substantive considerations in scale construction was emphasized further.
项目细微性与表面效度之间的区别(霍尔登和杰克逊,1979年)为重新评估明尼苏达多相人格调查表抑郁量表(MMPI D量表,N = 214)中细微项目的研究结果提供了依据。结果表明,在D量表中纳入非病理性项目并未提高抑郁标准的预测效度。进一步强调了在量表编制中进行实质性考量的必要性。