Hryckowian M J, Gynther M D
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Mar;44(2):148-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<148::aid-jclp2270440209>3.0.co;2-o.
This study examined the item subtlety-face validity issue by comparing MMPI Depression scale items rated in terms of psychopathology-in-general vs. specific depression criteria. The study also evaluated the influence of number of definitional descriptors and the meaning attributed to the neutral rating. Results showed substantial correlations among ratings obtained by different procedures, but many differences in subtle-neutral-obvious classifications. Number of descriptors did not effect ratings, although these results might not be found for less familiar constructs. Most raters took "neutral" to mean unrelated. These findings suggest that the inconsistencies in this research area are related to definitional problems and methodological ambiguities.
本研究通过比较根据一般精神病理学与特定抑郁标准评定的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)抑郁量表项目,检验了项目细微差别-表面效度问题。该研究还评估了定义描述词数量的影响以及赋予中性评定的含义。结果显示,不同程序获得的评定之间存在显著相关性,但在细微-中性-明显分类方面存在许多差异。描述词数量并未影响评定,尽管对于不太熟悉的结构可能不会发现这些结果。大多数评定者将“中性”理解为不相关。这些发现表明,该研究领域的不一致性与定义问题和方法上的模糊性有关。