Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达多相人格测验项目的微妙之处:再审视

MMPI item subtlety: another look.

作者信息

Hryckowian M J, Gynther M D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1988 Mar;44(2):148-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<148::aid-jclp2270440209>3.0.co;2-o.

Abstract

This study examined the item subtlety-face validity issue by comparing MMPI Depression scale items rated in terms of psychopathology-in-general vs. specific depression criteria. The study also evaluated the influence of number of definitional descriptors and the meaning attributed to the neutral rating. Results showed substantial correlations among ratings obtained by different procedures, but many differences in subtle-neutral-obvious classifications. Number of descriptors did not effect ratings, although these results might not be found for less familiar constructs. Most raters took "neutral" to mean unrelated. These findings suggest that the inconsistencies in this research area are related to definitional problems and methodological ambiguities.

摘要

本研究通过比较根据一般精神病理学与特定抑郁标准评定的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)抑郁量表项目,检验了项目细微差别-表面效度问题。该研究还评估了定义描述词数量的影响以及赋予中性评定的含义。结果显示,不同程序获得的评定之间存在显著相关性,但在细微-中性-明显分类方面存在许多差异。描述词数量并未影响评定,尽管对于不太熟悉的结构可能不会发现这些结果。大多数评定者将“中性”理解为不相关。这些发现表明,该研究领域的不一致性与定义问题和方法上的模糊性有关。

相似文献

1
MMPI item subtlety: another look.明尼苏达多相人格测验项目的微妙之处:再审视
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Mar;44(2):148-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<148::aid-jclp2270440209>3.0.co;2-o.
2
MMPI item subtlety: familiar vs unfamiliar constructs.明尼苏达多相人格调查表项目的微妙之处:熟悉与不熟悉的结构
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Sep;45(5):778-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<778::aid-jclp2270450513>3.0.co;2-q.
3
Face validity vs. item subtlety in the MMPI D scale.明尼苏达多相人格量表抑郁分量表中表面效度与项目细微度的比较
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Mar;40(2):499-504. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<499::aid-jclp2270400219>3.0.co;2-y.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验