Borg J
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;47(4):344-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.4.344.
Electromyographic single motor unit recordings were used to study the axonal refractory period of 28 accessory nerve innervated motor units in young normal subjects and 10 reinnervated motor units in elderly subjects. The refractory period was measured after a conditioning antidromic propagated nerve impulse and after a conditioning electrical nerve stimulus delivered through the same electrode as the test stimulus. The refractory period after a propagated impulse was 1.83 +/- 0.26 ms when test stimulus strength was 10% above the axonal threshold at rest and 0.88 +/- 0.26 ms when test stimulus strength was 100% above threshold. Corresponding data after an electrical stimulus were 2.38 +/- 0.32 ms and 1.28 +/- 0.22 ms. The difference between the methods was partially due to the effect of stimulus spread when the refractory period was measured after an antidromic propagated nerve impulse. Different properties of the nerve fibre membrane and the surrounding tissues after a propagated nerve impulse and after an electrical stimulus might also contribute. For further studies of motor unit pathology both methods seem equally reliable when proper normal data are available.
采用肌电图单运动单位记录法,研究了年轻正常受试者28个副神经支配的运动单位以及老年受试者10个再支配运动单位的轴突不应期。在给予一个条件性逆向传导的神经冲动后,以及通过与测试刺激相同的电极给予一个条件性电神经刺激后,测量不应期。当测试刺激强度比静息时的轴突阈值高10%时,传导冲动后的不应期为1.83±0.26毫秒;当测试刺激强度比阈值高100%时,不应期为0.88±0.26毫秒。电刺激后的相应数据分别为2.38±0.32毫秒和1.28±0.22毫秒。两种方法之间的差异部分归因于在逆向传导神经冲动后测量不应期时刺激扩散的影响。传导神经冲动后和电刺激后神经纤维膜及周围组织的不同特性也可能起作用。对于运动单位病理学的进一步研究,当有合适的正常数据时,两种方法似乎同样可靠。