Yager J, Strauss G D, Tardiff K
J Med Educ. 1984 Jun;59(6):471-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198406000-00003.
Residency training directors have noted considerable variability in the quality of deans' letters sent by medical schools on behalf of graduating students. A total of 212 deans' letters from 103 U.S. medical schools received by a large psychiatric residency program were rated by two of the authors. Of these, 26.9 percent were judged excellent, 49.5 percent average, and 23.6 percent poor. Excellent letters were characterized by detailed personal and academic comments; verbatim statements for each clinical clerkship; tactful , yet explicit, remarks about problems; and internal consistency. Poor letters were generally short regardless of content, offered global impressions about clerkship performance by fusing remarks from several different clerkships without identifying sources, or omitted important information that was quickly evident to the discriminating interviewer. Recommendations are offered for authors and readers of deans' letters and to medical students.
住院医师培训项目主任们注意到,医学院校为即将毕业的学生出具的院长推荐信质量存在很大差异。两位作者对一个大型精神科住院医师培训项目收到的来自103所美国医学院校的总共212封院长推荐信进行了评级。其中,26.9%被评为优秀,49.5%为中等,23.6%为较差。优秀的推荐信具有详细的个人和学术评价、每个临床实习的逐字陈述、对问题委婉但明确的评论以及内部一致性。较差的推荐信通常篇幅简短,无论内容如何,通过将来自几个不同实习的评论融合在一起而不指明来源来给出关于实习表现的总体印象,或者遗漏了敏锐的面试官能很快发现的重要信息。针对院长推荐信的作者、读者以及医学生提出了建议。