Turnbull J M
Department of Medicine, University Hospital, London.
CMAJ. 1991 May 1;144(9):1125-8.
The selection of medical graduates for postgraduate training has often been considered to be unreliable and arbitrary because of the quality of information made available by medical schools to program directors. Many faculties of medicine have changed from reporting graduate performance in percentage grades to using an honours/pass/fail grading system to ensure that clearly established criteria for competence have been met and to encourage excellence and minimize competition. Unfortunately, the honours/pass/fail grading system has not been able to give a clear statement of relative class standing to assist in postgraduate selection. This paper describes a modified honours grading system, which takes into account a student's grade, the relative weighting of a course and the number of honours grades awarded per course. The proposed system was found to rank students in a way similar to that of the traditional percentage grading system, with no significant loss in internal consistency. The modified honours grading system permits faculties that use honours/pass/fail grades to report student performance and class standing, thereby assisting program directors in the selection of medical students for postgraduate training.
由于医学院向项目主任提供的信息质量问题,医学毕业生研究生培训的选拔往往被认为不可靠且随意。许多医学院已从以百分比成绩报告毕业生表现转变为采用荣誉/通过/不及格评分系统,以确保满足明确制定的能力标准,鼓励优秀并减少竞争。不幸的是,荣誉/通过/不及格评分系统未能清晰说明相对班级排名,以协助研究生选拔。本文描述了一种改进的荣誉评分系统,该系统考虑了学生的成绩、课程的相对权重以及每门课程授予的荣誉成绩数量。结果发现,该提议的系统对学生的排名方式与传统百分比评分系统类似,内部一致性没有显著损失。改进的荣誉评分系统允许使用荣誉/通过/不及格成绩的学院报告学生表现和班级排名,从而协助项目主任选拔医学研究生进行培训。