Suppr超能文献

[Pros and cons of preservatives in eyedrops. Questionnaire for practitioners and experimental studies with reference to the requirements of the German Pharmacopoeia of August 1978].

作者信息

Conrads H, Winterhoff D, Strotmann U

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1984 Mar;184(3):233-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1054453.

Abstract

The first part of this paper deals with the regulations in the DAB 8/78 stating that eye-drops are to be preserved. A questionnaire prepared by the German Association of Ophthalmologists is analyzed. The four questions put to 353 ophthalmologists and answered by 350 of these concern the need for unpreserved eye-drops because of the danger of allergization; the expiry date once the bottle has been opened; infections due to eye-drops without preservatives; and the need for eye-drops made up by pharmacists. The second part deals with studies on the pH-values of lacrimal fluid in cases of normal and decreased lacrimation, as well as with the bactericidal action of the normal tear fluid containing lysozyme and lactotransferrine and various eye-drops containing preservatives. The authors conclude that the general addition of preservatives to eye-drops, especially to those containing antiphlogistic and astringent substances, is unnecessary. Concerning the expiry date on the bottle, it is suggested that the period of use be extended to three months, thus helping to cut costs.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验