Suppr超能文献

[残端、幻肢及创伤后疼痛的对侧局部麻醉]

[Contralateral local anesthesia in stump, phantom and post-traumatic pain].

作者信息

Gross D

出版信息

Reg Anaesth. 1984 Apr;7(2):65-73.

PMID:6729157
Abstract

Contralateral local anaesthesia was employed in patients with chronic (n = 42) and acute (n = 8) pain syndromes (see Table 1). I. Phantom limb and stump pain: n = 10; II. Pain of face and ear: n = 10; III. Pain of neck and trunk: n = 14; IV. Pain of the hip joint: n = 6; V. Pain of the extremities: n = 10: Sa. = 50 patients. Among these were n acute pain syndromes: I.: n = 0; II.: n = 1; III.: n = 1; IV.: n = 1; V.: n = 5 (Sa.: n = 8). 42 patients with chronic pain syndromes were treated with contralateral local anaesthesia (CLA). In 27 patients CLA displayed a clear effect upon the chronic pain; in 8 patients pain release was more than 50%, in 15 patients pain release was less than 50%. 3 patients relapsed into their former condition of pain. CLA was without any positive influence in 12 cases. The medium frequency of treatments was between 5 and 6 in both groups. The average time of treatment amounted to 6 and 7 months respectively. In 8 patients with acute pain syndromes contralateral local anaesthesia produced the following results: 6 patients were permanently released from their pain; in 2 patients CLA remained without any success. The average frequency of treatment was 1.25; the average time of observation was 2.3 months. Hence we suggest that CLA should be employed as early as possible in acute or chronic posttraumatic or postoperative pain syndromes. The influence of contralateral pain therapy on acute and chronic pain conditions of the opposite side can be affirmed; its mechanism remains to be clarified. Obviously it is possible to exert an inhibitory influence from the contralateral side upon peripheral, spinal, reticular and thalamic regions, which can lead to the extinction of acute and chronic pain conditions on the opposite side. According to our experiences it is necessary that the cerebro-spinal nerve system - apart from the traumatic lesion - is intact and that the pain syndrome is not maintained by a psychic disturbance.

摘要

对患有慢性疼痛综合征(n = 42)和急性疼痛综合征(n = 8)的患者采用对侧局部麻醉(见表1)。I. 幻肢痛和残端痛:n = 10;II. 面部和耳部疼痛:n = 10;III. 颈部和躯干疼痛:n = 14;IV. 髋关节疼痛:n = 6;V. 四肢疼痛:n = 10:总计 = 50例患者。其中急性疼痛综合征患者数量为:I.:n = 0;II.:n = 1;III.:n = 1;IV.:n = 1;V.:n = 5(总计:n = 8)。42例慢性疼痛综合征患者接受了对侧局部麻醉(CLA)治疗。27例患者中CLA对慢性疼痛有明显效果;8例患者疼痛缓解超过50%,15例患者疼痛缓解不足50%。3例患者疼痛复发。12例患者中CLA无任何积极影响。两组治疗的平均次数均在5至6次之间。平均治疗时间分别为6个月和7个月。8例急性疼痛综合征患者采用对侧局部麻醉的结果如下:6例患者疼痛永久缓解;2例患者CLA治疗无效。平均治疗次数为1.25次;平均观察时间为2.3个月。因此,我们建议在急性或慢性创伤后或术后疼痛综合征中应尽早采用CLA。对侧疼痛治疗对另一侧急性和慢性疼痛状况的影响是肯定的;其机制仍有待阐明。显然,有可能从对侧对外周、脊髓、网状和丘脑区域产生抑制作用,这可能导致另一侧急性和慢性疼痛状况的消退。根据我们的经验,除创伤性病变外,脑脊髓神经系统必须完整,且疼痛综合征不是由精神障碍维持的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验