Suppr超能文献

通过眼体积描记法间接评估颈动脉闭塞性疾病。500毫米汞柱真空压力测量和眼脉搏计时。

Indirect assessment of carotid occlusive disease by ocular pneumoplethysmography. 500 mm Hg vacuum pressure measurements and ocular pulse timing.

作者信息

Schwartz J A, Flanigan P, Schuler J J, Ryan T J, Castronuovo J J

出版信息

Stroke. 1984 May-Jun;15(3):521-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.3.521.

Abstract

The interpretation and diagnostic value of the ophthalmic artery pressure measurement and ocular pulse timing modes of the 500 mm Hg vacuum OPG-Gee ocular pneumoplethysmograph were evaluated in 65 patients who underwent aortic arch and cerebral arteriography. Data analysis revealed the OPG-Gee differential tracing which electronically compares and amplifies differences between the right and left eye pulse waveforms to be of little value. In predicting the presence of a greater than or equal to 50 percent diameter unilateral stenosis, an eye-eye pulse interval of greater than 15 msec was 82 percent accurate, a greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg ophthalmic artery pressure difference was 77 percent accurate and when combined these two criteria were 84 percent accurate. Neither of the criteria intended to detect bilateral carotid lesions, eye-ear pulse interval nor ophthalmic/brachial pressure index, were reliable. Ocular pulse timing was found to be highly specific but insensitive to hemodynamically significant carotid disease. OPG-Gee pressure determinations were more sensitive but lacked specificity. In combination, these criteria allowed identification of unilateral hemodynamically significant lesions with a sensitivity of 83 percent and a specificity of 86 percent. If used to detect more severe degrees of arteriographic stenosis, 60 and 70 percent diameter reduction, the overall diagnostic accuracy of these techniques was not improved. These results do not justify the use of the OPG-Gee instrument as a single noninvasive test for carotid arterial disease.

摘要

对65例行主动脉弓和脑动脉造影的患者,评估了500 mmHg真空OPG-Gee眼体积描记仪的眼动脉压测量和眼脉搏计时模式的解读及诊断价值。数据分析显示,通过电子方式比较并放大左右眼脉搏波形差异的OPG-Gee差异描记几乎没有价值。在预测直径大于或等于50%的单侧狭窄时,眼-眼脉搏间隔大于15毫秒的准确率为82%,眼动脉压差大于或等于5 mmHg的准确率为77%,将这两个标准结合使用时准确率为84%。旨在检测双侧颈动脉病变的标准,即眼-耳脉搏间隔和眼/肱动脉压指数,均不可靠。发现眼脉搏计时具有高度特异性,但对血流动力学上有意义的颈动脉疾病不敏感。OPG-Gee压力测定更敏感,但缺乏特异性。综合起来,这些标准可识别单侧血流动力学上有意义的病变,敏感性为83%,特异性为86%。如果用于检测更严重程度的动脉造影狭窄,即直径减少60%和70%,这些技术的总体诊断准确性并未提高。这些结果并不支持将OPG-Gee仪器作为颈动脉疾病的单一非侵入性检测方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验