• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.“宝贝多伊”裁决——回顾与评论
West J Med. 1984 Feb;140(2):303-7.
2
Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.“无名女婴简”一案判决维持原判;诉讼失败。
Ob Gyn News. 1983;18(24):8.
3
'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue.“宝贝多伊”——一个医学伦理问题。
West J Med. 1985 Jun;142(6):837-41.
4
Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Aug;16(4):29-31.
5
Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1985 Winter;63(1):18-51.
6
Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg.医学团体诉讼旨在对“宝贝多伊”法规加上法律限制。
Med World News. 1984 Apr 9;25(7):19, 23.
7
Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Linacre Q. 1985 Feb;52(1):45-76.
8
'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.“宝贝多伊”法案提议受挫于法庭。
Med World News. 1983 Dec 12;24(23):27.
9
Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.医疗保健团体赞成进行本地的“宝贝多伊”审查。
Med World News. 1983 Sep 26;24(18):9.
10
Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.近期政府关于重症新生儿治疗的行动。
J Coll Univ Law. 1985 Spring;11(4):405-16.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
Pediatr Ann. 1981 Oct;10(10):16-22.
2
Letting defective babies die: who decides?
Am J Law Med. 1982 Winter;7(4):393-423.
3
Legal problems of medical practice; withholding treatment from defective newborns.
Law Med Health Care. 1982 Feb;10(1):4-10.
4
The American Academy of Pediatrics comments on the "Baby Doe II" regulations.美国儿科学会对“婴儿多伊二号”规定发表评论。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Aug 18;309(7):443-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308183090728.
5
Decision making on critically ill infants by parents.父母对危重症婴儿的决策制定。
Am J Dis Child. 1983 Aug;137(8):795-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140340075019.
6
Medical progress. Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention (first of two parts).医学进展。先天性畸形:病因学因素及其在预防中的作用(两部分中的第一部分)
N Engl J Med. 1983 Feb 24;308(8):424-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198302243080804.
7
Pediatric nursing homes. Implications of the Massachusetts experience for residential care of multiply handicapped children.儿科疗养院。马萨诸塞州的经验对多重残疾儿童寄宿照料的启示。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Sep 15;309(11):640-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198309153091105.
8
Acquittal of paediatrician charged after death of infant with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征婴儿死亡后被指控的儿科医生无罪释放。
Lancet. 1981 Nov 14;2(8255):1101-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91290-3.
9
Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971 Jun;13(3):279-303.
10
Our role in the generation, modification, and termination of life.我们在生命的产生、改变和终结过程中所扮演的角色。
Arch Intern Med. 1969 Aug;124(2):215-37.

“宝贝多伊”裁决——回顾与评论

'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.

作者信息

Britton J R

出版信息

West J Med. 1984 Feb;140(2):303-7.

PMID:6730486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1021638/
Abstract

The recent controversy over the "Baby Doe" regulations issued by the Department of Health and Human Services represents the culmination of a dilemma that has faced the medical and legal professions for more than a decade. Although they have not been upheld by the courts, the regulations express the position that withholding treatment from defective newborns may constitute discrimination on the basis of handicap and advocate mechanisms for the reporting of such practices. Legislation regarding this issue is pending at both the national and state levels. The rulings have been disputed by many medical and professional groups, which are working to provide acceptable alternatives.

摘要

美国卫生与公众服务部发布的“宝贝 Doe”法规最近引发的争议,代表了医疗和法律行业十多年来面临的困境的顶点。尽管这些法规未得到法院支持,但它们表达了这样一种立场:不给有缺陷的新生儿提供治疗可能构成基于残疾的歧视,并倡导建立报告此类行为的机制。关于这个问题的立法在国家和州层面都悬而未决。这些裁决受到了许多医疗和专业团体的质疑,他们正在努力提供可接受的替代方案。