Watchko J F
Am J Dis Child. 1983 Aug;137(8):795-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140340075019.
Two schools of thought regarding participation in decision making on critically ill infants have developed. One school places the responsibility for decision making in the hands of a forum, and the other school places it in the hands of the parent and physician. These two approaches are examined and contrasted. From the dialectic developed, there emerges a third alternative that potentially encompasses the needs of all involved participants more fully, especially when participants find themselves confronted with difficult decisions and still unresolved conflict. This third approach is the matrix paradigm.
关于参与危重症婴儿决策形成了两种思想流派。一派将决策责任置于一个论坛手中，另一派则将其置于父母和医生手中。对这两种方法进行了审视和对比。从所形成的辩证法中，出现了第三种选择，它可能更全面地涵盖所有相关参与者的需求，尤其是当参与者发现自己面临艰难决策且冲突仍未解决时。这种第三种方法就是矩阵范式。
