• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized clinical trials of cancer treatment--a public opinion survey.

作者信息

Kemp N, Skinner E, Toms J

出版信息

Clin Oncol. 1984 Jun;10(2):155-61.

PMID:6734007
Abstract

An interview survey was carried out among 1022 adults, representative of a cross-section of the population aged 16-70, to find out how people reacted to the idea of participating in randomized clinical trials of cancer treatment. A secondary purpose of the survey was to learn whether or not people wanted their doctor to give them information about their illness, the treatment and the trials. Overall, there was no evidence of antipathy to the concept of randomized trials. Two out of three of those interviewed were prepared to participate, except in the most demanding situations when just over half wished to choose their own treatment. There was a strong response in favour of being given information and a very high level of confidence in doctors. Both respondents and interviewers were enthusiastic about participating in the survey.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trials of cancer treatment--a public opinion survey.
Clin Oncol. 1984 Jun;10(2):155-61.
2
Research ethics and clinical trials: fostering collaboration with research participants.研究伦理与临床试验:促进与研究参与者的合作
Account Res. 1999;6(3):215-26. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573929.
3
Strategy and alternate randomized designs in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中的策略与交替随机设计
Cancer Treat Rep. 1982 May;66(5):1095-100.
4
What is this thing called "randomise"?“随机化”这个东西是什么?
Lancet. 1997 Nov 15;350(9089):1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64205-5.
5
Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.让患者参与临床试验:对潜在参与者观点的初步研究。
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):227-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.227.
6
Consent to randomized treatment.同意随机治疗。
Lancet. 1982 Nov 20;2(8308):1164.
7
Danish patients' attitudes to scientific-ethical questions. An interview study focusing therapeutic trials.
Acta Med Scand. 1984;215(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04978.x.
8
A new design for randomized clinical trials. The Clinical Oncological Society of Australia.一种随机临床试验的新设计。澳大利亚临床肿瘤学会。
Med J Aust. 1981 Feb 21;1(4):161-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb135431.x.
9
Informed consent and controlled trials.知情同意与对照试验。
Lancet. 1988 Nov 19;2(8621):1194-5.
10
Clinical trials.临床试验。
Semin Surg Oncol. 1996 Jan-Feb;12(1):32-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199601/02)12:1<32::AID-SSU5>3.0.CO;2-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and strategies for effective recruitment.影响参与眼科临床试验意愿的因素及有效招募策略。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 18;17(1):157-163. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.01.21. eCollection 2024.
2
Study design factors influencing patients' willingness to participate in clinical research: a randomised vignette-based study.影响患者参与临床研究意愿的研究设计因素:一项基于随机案例的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Apr 26;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00979-z.
3
Factors associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials: a nationwide survey study.
与参与临床试验意愿相关的因素:一项全国性调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 17;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12889-014-1339-0.
4
The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.实证研究在知情同意理论与实践研究中的前景。
HEC Forum. 2004 Mar;16(1):53-71. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000031780.66472.f4.
5
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.从患者、公众和医疗保健专业人员角度看随机对照试验的伦理问题
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1209.
6
Informed consent in surgical trials.外科手术试验中的知情同意。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Oct 13;289(6450):937-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6450.937.