The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.
作者信息
Edwards S J, Lilford R J, Hewison J
机构信息
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT.
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1209.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.从患者、公众和医疗保健专业人员角度看随机对照试验的伦理问题
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1209-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1209.
2
Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.治疗性研究对知情同意及临床试验伦理的影响：肿瘤医学视角
J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1601-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1601.
3
Financial ties as part of informed consent to postmarketing research. Attitudes of American doctors and patients.作为上市后研究知情同意一部分的经济关联。美国医生和患者的态度。
BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1660-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1660.
4
Suspended judgment. Clinical trials of informed consent.暂缓判断。知情同意的临床试验。
Control Clin Trials. 1992 Oct;13(5):321-4. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90034-w.
5
Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding.I期癌症试验。误解的交织。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4):34-43.
6
Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.完全知情同意可能会无端地残忍。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1199-201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1199.
7
Ethics of consent for babies in randomised clinical trials.随机临床试验中婴儿的同意伦理问题。
Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1370.
8
Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?临床研究的同意——是充分自愿还是受到实质性影响？
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.232.
9
How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.如何解决关于随机临床试验的伦理困境。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):691-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410912.
10
What is this thing called "randomise"?“随机化”这个东西是什么？
Lancet. 1997 Nov 15;350(9089):1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64205-5.
引用本文的文献
1
A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Successful Recruitment and Treatment of Minority Patients on Therapeutic Cancer Clinical Trials at a Tertiary Referral Center Using Photo-Elicitation Interviews.一种混合方法，通过照片引发访谈，探索在三级转诊中心针对癌症治疗临床试验中少数族裔患者的成功招募与治疗情况。
Health Equity. 2024 Feb 28;8(1):117-127. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0170. eCollection 2024.
2
Is equipoise a useful concept to justify randomised controlled trials in the cultural context of Pakistan? A survey of clinicians in relation to a trial of talking therapy for young people who self-harm.均衡状态是一个有用的概念，可以为在巴基斯坦文化背景下进行的随机对照试验提供正当理由吗？一项针对与年轻人自伤的谈话治疗试验相关的临床医生的调查。
Trials. 2023 Aug 8;24(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07397-8.
3
Exploring motivations for participating in research among Australian women with advanced gynaecological cancer: a qualitative study.探讨澳大利亚晚期妇科癌症女性参与研究的动机：一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Aug 8;31(9):511. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07979-x.
4
Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient-centered outcomes research: Results of an embedded multiple case study.考察研究团队如何在以患者为中心的结局研究中管理不同观点和优先级：一项嵌入式多案例研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1606-1617. doi: 10.1111/hex.13765. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.关于针对黑人的种族靶向基因检测的态度和信念：系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):435-461. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1653. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Decision-making Among Hepatitis C Virus-negative Transplant Candidates Offered Organs from Donors with HCV Infection.丙型肝炎病毒阴性的移植受者在获得来自丙型肝炎病毒感染供体的器官时的决策制定。
Transplant Direct. 2022 Jul 19;8(8):e1341. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001341. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Physicians' Recognition and Management of Kidney Disease: A Randomized Vignette Study Evaluating the Impact of the KDIGO 2012 CKD Classification System.医生对肾脏疾病的识别与管理：一项评估KDIGO 2012慢性肾脏病分类系统影响的随机病例研究
Kidney Med. 2020 Feb 22;2(3):258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.12.008. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
A qualitative study on stakeholders' views on the participation of pregnant women in the APOSTEL VI study: a low-risk obstetrical RCT.关于利益相关者对孕妇参与 APOSTEL VI 研究的看法的定性研究：一项低风险产科 RCT。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2209-7.
9
Psychosocial Interventions for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families.针对晚期癌症患者及其家属的心理社会干预措施。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014 Apr 17;10(1):53-63. doi: 10.1177/1559827614530966. eCollection 2016 Jan-Feb.
10
Reflections on translation: Views of participants in a multisite Canadian CCSVI clinical trial.翻译反思：加拿大多中心慢性脑脊髓静脉功能不全（CCCSVI）临床试验参与者的观点
Neurol Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;8(3):232-239. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000462.
本文引用的文献
1
Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.迈向关于知情同意的明智讨论：实证研究的综述与批判
Ariz Law Rev. 1983;25(2):265-346.
2
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验设计与实施中的伦理问题。
Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec;2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
3
How preliminary data affect people's stated willingness to enter a hypothetical randomized controlled trial.初步数据如何影响人们表示愿意参与一项假设性随机对照试验的意愿。
J Investig Med. 1997 Dec;45(9):561-6.
4
Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial.理解随机分组；重症婴儿父母对临床试验中治疗随机分配的反应。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4.
5
Equipoise and the ethics of randomization.equipoise与随机化的伦理问题。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Oct;88(10):552-9.
6
[Good clinical practice in clinical trials: the responsibilities of the investigator. A survey of 827 hospital physicians (and II). Patient consent].
Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Mar 20;100(11):423-7.
7
8
Patients' attitudes to participation in clinical trials.患者对参与临床试验的态度。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;35(2):204-7.
9
Formal measurement of clinical uncertainty: prelude to a trial in perinatal medicine. The Fetal Compromise Group.临床不确定性的正式测量：围产期医学试验的前奏。胎儿窘迫研究组。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 8;308(6921):111-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6921.111.
10
Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.完全知情同意可能会无端地残忍。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1199-201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1199.
Zotero 插件