• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics.

作者信息

Ottenbacher K J, Petersen P

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1984 Aug;23(8):423-7. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300801.

DOI:10.1177/000992288402300801
PMID:6734016
Abstract

The quantitative literature review is presented as a unique type of research endeavor complete with formal stages that parallel those associated with primary or experimental research. This article provides a tutorial overview of the quantitative literature review procedure and, in conjunction with the companion article published in this issue, serves to illustrate the application of this technique in the review process. The stages in quantitative review include: (1) problem formation; (2) data collection; (3) data evaluation; (4) analysis and interpretation; and (5) reporting results. It is argued that inferences made in the research review process are as central to the establishment of valid biomedical and clinical knowledge as inferences made in primary research. Despite some limitations, quantitative reviewing procedures constitute a significant advance over the traditional narrative methods of integrating empirical research in an area of interest. The use of quantitative reviewing procedures represents a paradigm shift in which the literature review is conceptualized as a unique form of scientific inquiry complete with formal stages and methods. The adoption of these methods should assist researchers in the behavioral and biomedical sciences in establishing scientifically valid data bases to guide theory development and direct future clinical investigation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1984 Aug;23(8):423-7. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300801.
2
Quantitative reviewing: the literature review as scientific inquiry.定量综述:作为科学探究的文献综述
Am J Occup Ther. 1983 May;37(5):313-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.37.5.313.
3
The efficacy of vestibular stimulation as a form of specific sensory enrichment. Quantitative review of the literature.前庭刺激作为一种特定感觉强化形式的功效。文献的定量综述。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1984 Aug;23(8):428-33. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300802.
4
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.脊髓型颈椎病:评估文献和建立最佳证据的方法学途径。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf.
5
Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.综述文章:生物医学文献中的报告规范。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):813-21. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9973-z. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
6
Publications by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology: the quality of research design and statistical methodology.美国儿科学会泌尿学分会的出版物:研究设计和统计方法的质量
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.066. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
7
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays.通过联合展示在健康科学混合方法研究中整合定量和定性结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1865.
8
Do peer guidelines or editorial policies affect the reporting and discussion of race and ethnicity in pediatric research?同行指南或编辑政策是否会影响儿科研究中种族和民族的报告与讨论?
Account Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;12(1):17-31. doi: 10.1080/08989620590918907.
9
In pursuit of cumulative knowledge in health communication: the role of meta-analysis.追求健康传播领域的累积知识:元分析的作用。
Health Commun. 2006;20(2):169-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc2002_8.
10
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.