Dalla-Palma L, Bazzocchi M, Pozzi-Mucelli R S, Rossi M, Stacul F, Agostini R, Maffessanti M
Eur J Radiol. 1984 May;4(2):156-60.
The authors have evaluated 22 patients with renal pelvis tumour (RPT) by means of excretory urography and ultrasonography. Six patients also underwent arteriography. The value of the three investigations in the diagnosis of the lesion, the nature, the pyelic origin and the extension are presented. It is concluded that urography remains the method of choice for the evaluation of RPT while ultrasonography may be considered complementary to urography in cases of non-functioning kidney, when the urographic filling device defect is uncertain and in the differentiation between the pyelic or parenchymal origin of the tumour.
作者通过排泄性尿路造影和超声检查对22例肾盂肿瘤(RPT)患者进行了评估。6例患者还接受了动脉造影。介绍了这三项检查在病变诊断、性质、肾盂起源及范围评估中的价值。结论是,尿路造影仍是评估RPT的首选方法,而在患肾功能丧失、尿路造影充盈缺损不确定以及鉴别肿瘤是肾盂起源还是实质起源的情况下,超声检查可作为尿路造影的补充检查方法。