Suppr超能文献

动态血压记录。可重复性和不可预测性。

Ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Reproducibility and unpredictability.

作者信息

des Combes B J, Porchet M, Waeber B, Brunner H R

出版信息

Hypertension. 1984 May-Jun;6(3):C110-5.

PMID:6735450
Abstract

The accuracy of blood pressure readings taken by the portable semiautomatic blood pressure recorder Remler M 2000 was investigated in 101 unselected, untreated volunteers. On the average, pressures recorded during usual daily activities were lower by approximately 10 mm Hg than pressures measured in the office. However, individual ambulatory pressures could not be predicted from office readings, and the difference varied among the volunteers from +14 to -43 mm Hg. The reproducibility of office and ambulatory pressures was investigated in 84 subjects. There was a highly significant correlation between pressure levels determined at a 3- to 4-month interval with both the conventional auscultatory method in the office and the Remler ambulatory recorder. These data demonstrate that the Remler M 2000 ambulatory blood pressure recorder, when used properly, provides reproducible blood pressure profiles during customary daily activities. The ambulatory pressure recorder seems particularly useful for a baseline evaluation of the usual daily blood pressure, which in the individual subject differs in a highly unpredictable manner from the blood pressure measured at the physician's office.

摘要

在101名未经挑选、未接受治疗的志愿者中,对便携式半自动血压记录仪Remler M 2000所测血压读数的准确性进行了研究。平均而言,日常活动期间记录的血压比在诊室测量的血压约低10毫米汞柱。然而,无法根据诊室读数预测个体动态血压,且志愿者之间的差异在+14至-43毫米汞柱之间。在84名受试者中研究了诊室血压和动态血压的可重复性。采用传统听诊法在诊室以及使用Remler动态记录仪在3至4个月的间隔内测定的血压水平之间存在高度显著的相关性。这些数据表明,Remler M 2000动态血压记录仪在正确使用时,可在日常活动期间提供可重复的血压情况。动态血压记录仪似乎对日常血压的基线评估特别有用,因为在个体受试者中,日常血压与在医生诊室测量的血压存在高度不可预测的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验